Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Vec extend and collect instead of repeatedly calling push #90813

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 12, 2021

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @GuillaumeGomez

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 11, 2021
@notriddle notriddle force-pushed the notriddle/vec-extend branch from bd28d5e to a82692d Compare November 11, 2021 23:11
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Nice! Since it'll very likely impact performance, I'll prevent putting it into a rollup.

@bors: r+ rollup=iffy

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 12, 2021

📌 Commit a82692d has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 12, 2021
hellow554 added a commit to hellow554/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2021
…uillaumeGomez

Use Vec extend and collect instead of repeatedly calling push
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 12, 2021

⌛ Testing commit a82692d with merge f31622a...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 12, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing f31622a to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 12, 2021
@bors bors merged commit f31622a into rust-lang:master Nov 12, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Nov 12, 2021
@notriddle notriddle deleted the notriddle/vec-extend branch November 12, 2021 15:34
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (f31622a): comparison url.

Summary: This change led to very large relevant improvements 🎉 in compiler performance.

  • Very large improvement in instruction counts (up to -8.7% on full builds of match-stress-enum)

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Wow, that's much better than what I expected!

@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor Author

That’s the magic of the TrustedLen trait 😉

@camelid
Copy link
Member

camelid commented Nov 12, 2021

Wow, that is really impressive!

@camelid
Copy link
Member

camelid commented Nov 12, 2021

Since it'll very likely impact performance, I'll prevent putting it into a rollup.

Just a note: it's better to use rollup=never if a PR will very likely affect perf. Otherwise, you can't tell what the perf changes were, and it may mask perf regressions in other rolled-up PRs.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

GuillaumeGomez commented Nov 12, 2021

iffy means "better not put it into a rollup unless it's strongly needed for whatever reason". So seems like a good match.

@camelid
Copy link
Member

camelid commented Nov 12, 2021

iffy means "better not put it into a rollup unless it's strongly needed for whatever reason". So seems like a good match.

If for some reason, someone really needed to put it into a rollup, they could just mark the PR as rollup-able. In my experience, iffy usually means "prone to failures during bors testing" or "may have slight perf changes, but unlikely to be anything significant".

But it's not a big deal; it just makes perf tracking easier.

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2021
Use Vec extend instead of repeated pushes on several places

Inspired by rust-lang#90813, I tried to use a simple regex (`for .*in.*\{\n.*push\(.*\);\n\s+}`) to search for more places that would use `Vec::push` in a loop and replace them with `Vec::extend`.

These probably won't have as much perf. impact as the original PR (if any), but it would probably be better to do a perf run to see if there are not any regressions.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2021
Use Vec extend instead of repeated pushes on several places

Inspired by rust-lang#90813, I tried to use a simple regex (`for .*in.*\{\n.*push\(.*\);\n\s+}`) to search for more places that would use `Vec::push` in a loop and replace them with `Vec::extend`.

These probably won't have as much perf. impact as the original PR (if any), but it would probably be better to do a perf run to see if there are not any regressions.
bors bot added a commit to rust-lang/rust-analyzer that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2021
10484: internal: Update match checking algorithm r=lnicola a=iDawer

Sync match checking algorithm with rust-lang/rust f31622a50 2021-11-12 (rust-lang/rust#90813)

This update brings huge simplification to the match checking and introduces an easy to use machinery for pattern destructuring and also:

1. Add a function to do post-inference normalization `hir_ty::infer::normalize(...)`.
2. Store binding modes in `InferenceResult`.

Todo:

- [x] Rebase & test (#10484 (comment))

Co-authored-by: Dawer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: iDawer <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants