Update RustyYato's email

[RustyYato]

I no longer use the old email address

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[Kivooeo]

@bors r+ rollup

[bors]

📌 Commit 261c37b has been approved by Kivooeo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 261c37b with merge 217cb73...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Kivooeo
Pushing 217cb73 to main...

[github-actions]

What is this?

This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing fb505a7 (parent) -> 217cb73 (this PR)

Test differences

Show 4 test diffs

4 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard 217cb73577ed6f30a2005dd75bab01d23ec4cd60 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

1. aarch64-apple: 6413.8s -> 7889.4s (+23.0%)
2. dist-aarch64-apple: 6786.2s -> 7794.6s (+14.9%)
3. dist-apple-various: 4072.1s -> 3480.3s (-14.5%)
4. dist-x86_64-apple: 7744.0s -> 8693.5s (+12.3%)
5. x86_64-gnu-llvm-21-2: 5629.0s -> 4955.9s (-12.0%)
6. tidy: 170.6s -> 155.1s (-9.1%)
7. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2479.3s -> 2701.6s (+9.0%)
8. aarch64-msvc-1: 7513.9s -> 6840.1s (-9.0%)
9. x86_64-msvc-ext2: 5435.5s -> 5911.7s (+8.8%)
10. dist-x86_64-solaris: 5217.8s -> 5616.9s (+7.6%)

How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (217cb73): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.1%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results (secondary -3.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.7%	[-3.7%, -3.7%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 475.249s -> 474.105s (-0.24%)
Artifact size: 388.68 MiB -> 388.71 MiB (0.01%)