Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove ValueAnalysis and ValueAnalysisWrapper. #132347

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

They represent a lot of abstraction and indirection, but they're only used for ConstAnalysis, and apparently won't be used for any other analyses in the future. This commit inlines and removes them, which makes ConstAnalysis easier to read and understand.

r? @cjgillot

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 30, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 30, 2024

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@nnethercote nnethercote force-pushed the rm-ValueAnalysisWrapper branch from a391e0f to ae81787 Compare October 30, 2024 08:14
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 30, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #132349) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

r=me after rebase

@nnethercote nnethercote force-pushed the rm-ValueAnalysisWrapper branch from ae81787 to edef792 Compare October 30, 2024 19:21
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

I rebased.

@bors r=cjgillot rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 30, 2024

📌 Commit edef792 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 30, 2024
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
…r, r=cjgillot

Remove `ValueAnalysis` and `ValueAnalysisWrapper`.

They represent a lot of abstraction and indirection, but they're only used for `ConstAnalysis`, and apparently won't be used for any other analyses in the future. This commit inlines and removes them, which makes `ConstAnalysis` easier to read and understand.

r? `@cjgillot`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#129383 (Remap impl-trait lifetimes on HIR instead of AST lowering)
 - rust-lang#132210 (rustdoc: make doctest span tweak a 2024 edition change)
 - rust-lang#132246 (Rename `rustc_abi::Abi` to `BackendRepr`)
 - rust-lang#132267 (force-recompile library changes on download-rustc="if-unchanged")
 - rust-lang#132344 (Merge `HostPolarity` and `BoundConstness`)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#132347 (Remove `ValueAnalysis` and `ValueAnalysisWrapper`.)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 31, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #132371) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 31, 2024
They represent a lot of abstraction and indirection, but they're only
used for `ConstAnalysis`, and apparently won't be used for any other
analyses in the future. This commit inlines and removes them, which
makes `ConstAnalysis` easier to read and understand.
@nnethercote nnethercote force-pushed the rm-ValueAnalysisWrapper branch from edef792 to 846e20c Compare October 31, 2024 01:52
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

I rebased.

@bors r=cjgillot

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 31, 2024

📌 Commit 846e20c has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Oct 31, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#132347 (Remove `ValueAnalysis` and `ValueAnalysisWrapper`.)
 - rust-lang#132365 (pass `RUSTC_HOST_FLAGS` at once without the for loop)
 - rust-lang#132366 (Do not enforce `~const` constness effects in typeck if `rustc_do_not_const_check`)
 - rust-lang#132376 (Annotate `input` reference tests)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e228e31 into rust-lang:master Oct 31, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.84.0 milestone Oct 31, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#132347 - nnethercote:rm-ValueAnalysisWrapper, r=cjgillot

Remove `ValueAnalysis` and `ValueAnalysisWrapper`.

They represent a lot of abstraction and indirection, but they're only used for `ConstAnalysis`, and apparently won't be used for any other analyses in the future. This commit inlines and removes them, which makes `ConstAnalysis` easier to read and understand.

r? `@cjgillot`
@nnethercote nnethercote deleted the rm-ValueAnalysisWrapper branch October 31, 2024 09:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants