Migrate pdb-buildinfo-cl-cmd and pgo-indirect-call-promotion run-make tests to rmake

src/tools/compiletest/src/command-list.rs

@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ const KNOWN_DIRECTIVE_NAMES: &[&str] = &[
     "only-watchos",
     "only-windows",
     "only-windows-gnu",
+    "only-windows-msvc",
     "only-x86",
     "only-x86_64",
     "only-x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx",

src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt

@@ -16,8 +16,6 @@ run-make/macos-deployment-target/Makefile
 run-make/min-global-align/Makefile
 run-make/native-link-modifier-bundle/Makefile
 run-make/no-alloc-shim/Makefile
-run-make/pdb-buildinfo-cl-cmd/Makefile
-run-make/pgo-indirect-call-promotion/Makefile
 run-make/remap-path-prefix-dwarf/Makefile
 run-make/reproducible-build/Makefile
 run-make/rlib-format-packed-bundled-libs/Makefile

tests/run-make/pdb-buildinfo-cl-cmd/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// Check if the pdb file contains the following information in the LF_BUILDINFO:
+// 1. full path to the compiler (cl)
+// 2. the commandline args to compile it (cmd)
+// This is because these used to be missing in #96475.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113492
+
+//@ only-windows-msvc
+// Reason: pdb files are unique to this architecture
+
+use run_make_support::{assert_contains, bstr, env_var, rfs, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    rustc()
+        .input("main.rs")
+        .arg("-g")
+        .crate_name("my_crate_name")
+        .crate_type("bin")
+        .metadata("dc9ef878b0a48666")
+        .run();
+    let tests = [
+        &env_var("RUSTC"),
+        r#""main.rs""#,
+        r#""-g""#,
+        r#""--crate-name""#,
+        r#""my_crate_name""#,
+        r#""--crate-type""#,
+        r#""bin""#,
+        r#""-Cmetadata=dc9ef878b0a48666""#,
+    ];
+    for test in tests {
+        assert_pdb_contains(test);
+    }
+}
+
+fn assert_pdb_contains(needle: &str) {
+    let needle = needle.as_bytes();
+    use bstr::ByteSlice;
+    assert!(&rfs::read("my_crate_name.pdb").find(needle).is_some());
+}

tests/run-make/pgo-indirect-call-promotion/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// This test checks that indirect call promotion is performed. The test
+// programs calls the same function a thousand times through a function pointer.
+// Only PGO data provides the information that it actually always is the same
+// function. We verify that the indirect call promotion pass inserts a check
+// whether it can make a direct call instead of the indirect call.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/66631
+
+//@ needs-profiler-support
+// Reason: llvm_profdata is used
+//@ ignore-cross-compile
+// Reason: the compiled binary is executed
+
+use run_make_support::{llvm_filecheck, llvm_profdata, rfs, run, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    // We don't compile `opaque` with either optimizations or instrumentation.
+    rustc().input("opaque.rs").run();
+    // Compile the test program with instrumentation
+    rfs::create_dir("prof_data_dir");
+    rustc().input("interesting.rs").profile_generate("prof_data_dir").opt().codegen_units(1).run();
+    rustc().input("main.rs").profile_generate("prof_data_dir").opt().run();
+    // The argument below generates to the expected branch weights
+    run("main");
+    llvm_profdata().merge().output("prof_data_dir/merged.profdata").input("prof_data_dir").run();
+    rustc()
+        .input("interesting.rs")
+        .profile_use("prof_data_dir/merged.profdata")
+        .opt()
+        .codegen_units(1)
+        .emit("llvm-ir")
+        .run();
+    llvm_filecheck().patterns("filecheck-patterns.txt").stdin(rfs::read("interesting.ll")).run();
+}