Remove libc patch

Signed-off-by: Ryan Levick <[email protected]>

Author: rylev

Cargo.lock

@@ -2151,8 +2151,9 @@ checksum = "db13adb97ab515a3691f56e4dbab09283d0b86cb45abd991d8634a9d6f501760"
 
 [[package]]
 name = "libc"
-version = "0.2.151"
-source = "git+https://github.com/rylev/rust-libc?rev=fc437f39b197e7713ca91f1385e4b309b3e9a820#fc437f39b197e7713ca91f1385e4b309b3e9a820"
+version = "0.2.150"
+source = "registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index"
+checksum = "89d92a4743f9a61002fae18374ed11e7973f530cb3a3255fb354818118b2203c"
 dependencies = [
  "rustc-std-workspace-core",
 ]

Cargo.toml

@@ -105,8 +105,6 @@ miniz_oxide.debug = 0
 object.debug = 0
 
 [patch.crates-io]
-libc = { git = "https://github.com/rylev/rust-libc", rev = "fc437f39b197e7713ca91f1385e4b309b3e9a820" }
-
 # See comments in `library/rustc-std-workspace-core/README.md` for what's going on
 # here
 rustc-std-workspace-core = { path = 'library/rustc-std-workspace-core' }

tests/ui/check-cfg/well-known-values.stderr

@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `_UNEXPECTED_VALUE`
 LL |     target_family = "_UNEXPECTED_VALUE",
    |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
-   = note: expected values for `target_family` are: `unix`, `wasm`, `windows`
+   = note: expected values for `target_family` are: `unix`, `wasi`, `wasm`, `windows`
    = help: to expect this configuration use `--check-cfg=cfg(target_family, values("_UNEXPECTED_VALUE"))`
    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/compiler-flags/check-cfg.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
 
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `_UNEXPECTED_VALUE`
 LL |     target_os = "_UNEXPECTED_VALUE",
    |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
-   = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `android`, `cuda`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `macos`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `openbsd`, `psp`, `redox`, `solaris`, `solid_asp3`, `teeos`, `tvos`, `uefi`, `unknown`, `vita`, `vxworks`, `wasi`, `watchos`, `windows`, `xous`
+   = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `android`, `cuda`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `macos`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `openbsd`, `psp`, `redox`, `solaris`, `solid_asp3`, `teeos`, `tvos`, `uefi`, `unknown`, `vita`, `vxworks`, `wasi`, `wasi-preview2`, `watchos`, `windows`, `xous`
    = help: to expect this configuration use `--check-cfg=cfg(target_os, values("_UNEXPECTED_VALUE"))`
    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/compiler-flags/check-cfg.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
 
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ LL | #[cfg(target_os = "linuz")] // testing that we suggest `linux`
    |                   |
    |                   help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"linux"`
    |
-   = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `android`, `cuda`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `macos`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `openbsd`, `psp`, `redox`, `solaris`, `solid_asp3`, `teeos`, `tvos`, `uefi`, `unknown`, `vita`, `vxworks`, `wasi`, `watchos`, `windows`, `xous`
+   = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `android`, `cuda`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `macos`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `openbsd`, `psp`, `redox`, `solaris`, `solid_asp3`, `teeos`, `tvos`, `uefi`, `unknown`, `vita`, `vxworks`, `wasi`, `wasi-preview2`, `watchos`, `windows`, `xous`
    = help: to expect this configuration use `--check-cfg=cfg(target_os, values("linuz"))`
    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/compiler-flags/check-cfg.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration