switch to GH actions

[marcoieni]

Closes #132

Questions:

• why is cross needed?
• Do you think I covered everything Travis was doing?

[marcoieni]

You can see a preview of the action running on my branch: https://github.com/MarcoIeni/svd/actions

[burrbull]

bors try

[brainstorm]

why is cross needed?

One thing that cross offers is (some) QEMU MCU emulation... I guess that using cross was a way to future-proof CI so that very simple emulation tests could be implemented in the future?

Other than that, LGTM 👍

[marcoieni]

I think we have to change this:

svd/bors.toml

Line 2 in 051e0b2

"continuous-integration/travis-ci/push",

[marcoieni]

I guess that using cross was a way to future-proof CI so that very simple emulation tests could be implemented in the future?

If we are not using it at the moment we can remove the use-cross flag in ci.yml. We can add it in the future if needed.

[burrbull]

cc @therealprof

[therealprof]

Please follow the conventions outlined in https://github.com/rust-embedded/wg/blob/master/ops/post-transfer.md

Specifically the trigger rules and bors.toml are not sufficient yet.

[marcoieni]

I think we have to change this:

svd/bors.toml

Line 2 in 051e0b2

"continuous-integration/travis-ci/push",

I completely removed the status field of bors, because maybe it is not required with github actions. Is this right?
Can you check if this field is present in some other project that uses bors and github actions?

EDIT: I saw therealprof comment, I will do it today!

[burrbull]

@therealprof can you check bors settings/permissions for this repo?

[bors]

try

Timed out.

[therealprof]

@therealprof can you check bors settings/permissions for this repo?

Can do but I think it should work already just fine.

[marcoieni]

Should I remove "S-waiting-on-team" from bors.toml? Because it is not present in the template.

[therealprof]

Should I remove "S-waiting-on-team" from bors.toml? Because it is not present in the template.

Don't bother. Doesn't do any harm.

[therealprof]

Mind squashing your commits?

[marcoieni]

Done!
For the future, have you considered adding use_squash_merge = true boolean variable to bors.toml? See https://bors.tech/documentation/

[therealprof]

Having separate commits can be very useful so auto-squashing is not a good idea.

[therealprof]

LGTM, thanks.

bors r+

[bors]

Build succeeded:

• build (stable)
• test
• build (1.36.0)