Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

90º terminals at all optical sizes #727

Open
chrisyalamov opened this issue Jul 31, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

90º terminals at all optical sizes #727

chrisyalamov opened this issue Jul 31, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Add Enhancement, Improvement, addition or new feature design Icebox Maybe sometime in the future

Comments

@chrisyalamov
Copy link

chrisyalamov commented Jul 31, 2024

I would like to propose a stylistic set which retains angle of terminals at 90º (as they are at opsz max) across all values along the opsz axis.

Screenshot 2024-07-31 at 03 12 10

I realise and appreciate this was likely a very deliberate design decision. However, I believe it's worth considering the addition of a stylistic set with 90º terminals (while preserving other modifications for adjusting optical size like the x-height), as it might help achieve a particular appearance consistent with Inter's Neo-grotesque nature.

Having used Inter in some recent projects, where Inter was deliberately selected for the way it looks at a large optical size, the 'look and feel' was significantly different at a smaller size.

@chrisyalamov chrisyalamov changed the title Flat terminals at all optical sizes 90º terminals at all optical sizes Jul 31, 2024
@rsms rsms added Add Enhancement, Improvement, addition or new feature design Icebox Maybe sometime in the future labels Nov 15, 2024
@rsms
Copy link
Owner

rsms commented Nov 15, 2024

Would be a nice addition. Akzidenz-Grotesk style

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Add Enhancement, Improvement, addition or new feature design Icebox Maybe sometime in the future
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants