You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Personal thoughts which lead to no specific direction:
xgnitive and textiles are slightly too ambitious
pure paper repositories are nice but sometimes too attached to code
sometimes I think about how other orgs do 1-repo=1-paper, but I'm not sure how this complies with code reuse among papers (apart from very obvious things that go into vision, kinematics-dynamics, etc)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
1-code-repo=1-paper does not comply with code reuse.
Something like splitting by theme seems reasonable. However, an from textiles import ironing also sounds attractive and would (possibly) require a superbuild if we were ever to split textiles into textiles-ironing/textiles-unfolding/etc
For papers, private textiles-papers/xgnitive-papers repos with 1 project per paper sounds reasonable. Regarding their folders: remove sent/pending separation, but can separate by topic: ironing/unfolding etc.
Organize research-oriented repos.
Personal thoughts which lead to no specific direction:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: