Fix GDBserver regression due to change to avoid reading shell registers

Simon reported that the recent change to make GDB and GDBserver avoid
reading shell registers caused a GDBserver regression, caught with
ASan while running gdb.server/non-existing-program.exp:

 $ /home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/../gdbserver/gdbserver stdio non-existing-program
 =================================================================
 ==127719==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x60f0000000e9 at pc 0x55bcbfa301f4 bp 0x7ffd238a7320 sp 0x7ffd238a7310
 WRITE of size 1 at 0x60f0000000e9 thread T0
     #0 0x55bcbfa301f3 in scoped_restore_tmpl<bool>::~scoped_restore_tmpl() /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdbsupport/scoped_restore.h:86
     #1 0x55bcbfa2ffe9 in post_fork_inferior(int, char const*) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/fork-child.cc:120
     #2 0x55bcbf9c9199 in linux_process_target::create_inferior(char const*, std::__debug::vector<char*, std::allocator<char*> > const&) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:991
     #3 0x55bcbf954549 in captured_main /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3941
     #4 0x55bcbf9552f0 in main /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4084
     #5 0x7ff9d663b0b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x240b2)
     #6 0x55bcbf8ef2bd in _start (/home/smarchi/build/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/gdbserver+0x1352bd)

 0x60f0000000e9 is located 169 bytes inside of 176-byte region [0x60f000000040,0x60f0000000f0)
 freed by thread T0 here:
     #0 0x7ff9d6c6f0c7 in operator delete(void*) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:160
     #1 0x55bcbf910d00 in remove_process(process_info*) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.cc:164
     #2 0x55bcbf9c4ac7 in linux_process_target::remove_linux_process(process_info*) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:454
     #3 0x55bcbf9cdaa6 in linux_process_target::mourn(process_info*) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:1599
     #4 0x55bcbf988dc4 in target_mourn_inferior(ptid_t) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/target.cc:205
     #5 0x55bcbfa32020 in startup_inferior(process_stratum_target*, int, int, target_waitstatus*, ptid_t*) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/../gdb/nat/fork-inferior.c:515
     #6 0x55bcbfa2fdeb in post_fork_inferior(int, char const*) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/fork-child.cc:111
     #7 0x55bcbf9c9199 in linux_process_target::create_inferior(char const*, std::__debug::vector<char*, std::allocator<char*> > const&) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:991
     #8 0x55bcbf954549 in captured_main /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3941
     #9 0x55bcbf9552f0 in main /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4084
     #10 0x7ff9d663b0b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x240b2)

 previously allocated by thread T0 here:
     #0 0x7ff9d6c6e5a7 in operator new(unsigned long) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:99
     #1 0x55bcbf910ad0 in add_process(int, int) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/inferiors.cc:144
     #2 0x55bcbf9c477d in linux_process_target::add_linux_process_no_mem_file(int, int) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:425
     #3 0x55bcbf9c8f4c in linux_process_target::create_inferior(char const*, std::__debug::vector<char*, std::allocator<char*> > const&) /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:985
     #4 0x55bcbf954549 in captured_main /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3941
     #5 0x55bcbf9552f0 in main /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4084
     #6 0x7ff9d663b0b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x240b2)

Above we see that in the non-existing-program case, the process gets
deleted before the starting_up flag gets restored to false.

This happens because startup_inferior calls target_mourn_inferior
before throwing an error, and in GDBserver, unlike in GDB, mourning
deletes the process.

Fix this by not using a scoped_restore to manage the starting_up flag,
since we should only clear it when startup_inferior doesn't throw.

Change-Id: I67325d6f81c64de4e89e20e4ec4556f57eac7f6c

Author: palves

gdbserver/fork-child.cc

@@ -105,12 +105,21 @@ post_fork_inferior (int pid, const char *program)
 #endif
 
   process_info *proc = find_process_pid (pid);
-  scoped_restore save_starting_up
-    = make_scoped_restore (&proc->starting_up, true);
+
+  /* If the inferior fails to start, startup_inferior mourns the
+     process (which deletes it), and then throws an error.  This means
+     that on exception return, we don't need or want to clear this
+     flag back, as PROC won't exist anymore.  Thus, we don't use a
+     scoped_restore.  */
+  proc->starting_up = true;
 
   startup_inferior (the_target, pid,
 		    START_INFERIOR_TRAPS_EXPECTED,
 		    &cs.last_status, &cs.last_ptid);
+
+  /* If we get here, the process was successfully started.  */
+  proc->starting_up = false;
+
   current_thread->last_resume_kind = resume_stop;
   current_thread->last_status = cs.last_status;
   signal_pid = pid;