-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
Update lightspeed-stack config to remove extra model provider name #95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update lightspeed-stack config to remove extra model provider name #95
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: carbonin The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
WalkthroughThe changes update the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)Not applicable: The changes are limited to configuration value adjustments and do not affect control flow or introduce new features. Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
This was added because of a bug and must now be fixed in the latest
version.
Before this fix the integration environment was returning responses
like:
```
{
"detail": {
"response": "Unable to process this request",
"cause": "Model gemini/gemini/gemini-2.0-flash from provider gemini not found in available models"
}
}
```
d30e768 to
d5b7737
Compare
|
/lgtm |
|
@oourfali: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/lgtm |
|
/test ? |
|
@omertuc: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs: Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
This was added because of a bug and must now be fixed in the latest version.
Before this fix the integration environment was returning responses
like:
cc @omertuc
Summary by CodeRabbit