-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Possible bug in test_loads.py #41
Comments
@renatopp can you please have a look at this? |
Hey, @mfeurer, despite the ARFF documentation, I always test all our ARFF examples within Weka. Thus, if Weka opens a given file, I think we should open too. For instance, this example ARFF can be opened with Weka (3.7+) so I guess there is no problem with this format. For reference, the example we are discussing here is:
|
I posted an issue over at the wekalist. Let's see what happens. |
Hey @mfeurer, any news on this issue? |
They confirmed it's a bug. I wrote again (2 hours ago) to ask whether they are going to change the behaviour. Let's see what happens. |
It'll be fixed in the next release. |
I just check this with the latest release and WEKA still parses this one :( |
Hi,
I think I stumbled upon a bug in test_loads.py in the method test_format_correct. This test should not pass in my opinion because the only line of data is the same line which contains
@data
.This also raises the question if a line which denotes
@data
should be checked with au_row.startswith()
. I propose to use au_row.startswith()
followed by a check if there is something else in the same line.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: