Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New PII-related regexes #20

Open
umair9747 opened this issue Oct 22, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

New PII-related regexes #20

umair9747 opened this issue Oct 22, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@umair9747
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I believe we can have more regexes for PII scanning. This can help expand the coverage of the tool.

Describe the solution you'd like
I discovered a website that has a good amount of regexes that I believe can be useful for Octopii: https://docs.trellix.com/bundle/data-loss-prevention-11.10.x-classification-definitions-reference-guide/page/GUID-66B1F12A-E267-4EEB-A9A5-A4398A6AF8CD.html

Additional context
None

@deniercounter
Copy link

Unfortunately https://docs.trellix.com/bundle/data-loss-prevention-11.10.x-classification-definitions-reference-guide/page/GUID-27F151A3-9CCA-40FF-99A0-35EEA1846AC8.html for the Austrian UID is not correct as this number starts with ATU then may be a blank or followed suit by 8 numbers.

First lookup and false answer. What a pity.

@umair9747
Copy link
Author

Trellix is a third-party source which we have no control after. Rather it is just a resource which we can use for adding up definitions (after verifying them ofcourse) + I am not sure if we have the Austrian UID definition within definitions.json do we? 🤔

@deniercounter
Copy link

@umair9747 Oh yes ... I am fully aware that this is a 3rd party.

@umair9747
Copy link
Author

Thanks for highlighting the false-positive case however, It will surely help to be extra careful while adding up new definitions to the tool. Appreciate your comment 🙌 @deniercounter

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants