Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some Problems About GroupNorm #103

Open
Selen-Suyue opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Some Problems About GroupNorm #103

Selen-Suyue opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Selen-Suyue
Copy link

Hello! Whether in your task or some other tasks I have chosen, I have found that the visual model of the diffusion policy has significantly improved the prediction of action after replacing batchnorm with groupnorm, and the same is true for the stability of training. When using batchnorm, the effect shown by the model is that the prediction of noise is getting better and converging during the training phase, but the prediction of action is not synchronized and has been very unstable. Your paper also mentioned the need to replace batchnorm, but did not give a theoretical explanation for this change. Can you give me some academic explanation or inspiring guidance on this phenomenon?

@richardrl
Copy link

Thanks for your post @Selen-Suyue . It seems like this repo is missing the groupnorm + spatial softmax mentioned in the paper.

@richardrl
Copy link

What settings did you use for groupnorm? @Selen-Suyue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants