Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lack of clarity about the "updated" timestamp #53

Open
llemeurfr opened this issue Dec 17, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

lack of clarity about the "updated" timestamp #53

llemeurfr opened this issue Dec 17, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@llemeurfr
Copy link
Contributor

The spec states that "The License Document may contain ... updated [defined as] Date and time when the license was last updated".

This is structurally true, but we find no evidence in the LCP spec that updated MUST be initialized if the license is updated.

In the LSD spec, It is written that in case of return/renew, "The server must update the timestamp of both License and Status Document contained in the status and license keys of the updated object.". Here again, this is only addressing the structural issue, not the conceptual one, i.e. that the updated timestamp of the license must be ... updated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant