You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been refining my writing process, and people have expressed interest.
Seek to minimize controversy. Most things exist as tradeoffs, emphasize positive side of tradeoff space. imgui would be a good example (partly because it's a chance to write down some "softer" thoughts on imgui)
Avoid emotionally charged language. Ableist and gendered language (when not needed) out.
When there's likelihood of confusion, circulate a draft and take feedback.
Have a queue, and have blogs in draft. This gives time to think about what I'm going to say. "compositor is evil" took 18mo. New plan: use issues to make this more explicit, encourage feedback earlier.
Target audience: a curious person who doesn't necessarily have a solid background. Take the opportunity to teach. (Contrast: "wall of greek" papers full of math content, seem to be more about showing off prowess)
Assume good faith, and ignore bad faith. (Mostly relevant in comment sections)
Generally I read the final draft aloud before publishing. Gives a chance to fix language poetry issues, rough transitions, missing pieces of the narrative.
A few thoughts on my "research" rebranding. In most case, the blog is the most efficient way to get research results out, with open source code as the artifact of record. I do occasional papers and conferences too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've been refining my writing process, and people have expressed interest.
A few thoughts on my "research" rebranding. In most case, the blog is the most efficient way to get research results out, with open source code as the artifact of record. I do occasional papers and conferences too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: