Pully's EP_Tube

[ponceta]

@qwat/board Like in #139, in Pully we have also protection tubes which are installed locally

These are 3D polylines, with attributes like protection type, material, filling material, nominal diameters (inner and outer), status, date, comment.

Are we the only ones to have that?

[tudorbarascu]

We also have protection pipes (in high traffic areas etc.) that go outside the range of what's currently in the data model (old PE pipe, old Steel pipe etc.).

[ponceta]

@tudorbarascu did you try defining a class for protection pipes?

I'll ask Lausanne too to see if they have adressed this issue.

[ponceta]

Nous avons un attribut dans la couche « conduite » qui identifie les conduites qui possède une protection autour de la conduite.
Nous nous posons la question pour la gestion des pousse-tubes, si on devrait les classer dans une autre table.
Actuellement les pousse-tubes (leur géométries) se trouvent dans les conduites.

I'm not a great fan of having protection pipes in pipe for topological reasons, but that's indeed a solution.

I'll see if I can come with a better proposal.