-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 532
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Accuracy reported is different from accuracy through reproduced models #46
Comments
Same. For mobilenet v2, with the default suggestion, I get something like: Average Precision Per-class: Average Precision Across All Classes:0.5087300350846028 This is probably because the line to train it lists only 20 epochs, which I don't think is enough. At 160 epochs, it's approaching the reported performance: Average Precision Per-class: Average Precision Across All Classes:0.6723829649257247 |
No, I have not. I may have misunderstood, but I thought OP was asking about how to get the same accuracy with re-training from the ImageNet weights. |
I have used the pretrained models, but I'm curious how you actually trained them- I was confused because I thought that the process you explain to train is actually how you trained those models. |
I used the pretrained model, and I set num_epochs 200. Only reach 0.66 |
Have you tried running it again? Could have just been an unlucky initialization. |
I will give a try. Have you reached the reported performance? How many epochs? |
Yes, by 200 epochs I reached the reported performance. |
Okay, thx. |
I notice that when I run the vgg and mobilenet v2 models that you have already trained I get very similar accuracy to what you've reported, but when I try to reproduce those models through the method you suggest, I get significantly lower (20%) accuracy. Do you have any suggestions about how to improve that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: