You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Inside qnn delegate, HTP hardware architecture available for HTP backend options starting from V68 to V75.
We can see that supported Chipset are snapdragon versions as below.
I have successfully used QCS6490 in the tutorial_for_llama2 provided by QPM (Qualcomm Package Manager). The key question is: would the results be the same when using tutorial_for_llama2 versus Executorch?
Alternatives
No response
Additional context
No response
RFC (Optional)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch
Inside qnn delegate, HTP hardware architecture available for HTP backend options starting from V68 to V75.
We can see that supported Chipset are snapdragon versions as below.
Supported Chipset
However, we like to utilize QCS6490 whose DSP Hexagon Arch is V68.
Is there any chance by just adding QCS6490 to utils.py , and qc_compiler_spec.fbs would work in executorch?
I have successfully used QCS6490 in the tutorial_for_llama2 provided by QPM (Qualcomm Package Manager). The key question is: would the results be the same when using tutorial_for_llama2 versus Executorch?
Alternatives
No response
Additional context
No response
RFC (Optional)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: