Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove conan buildconfig #2460

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Starbuck5
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure this was ever used, but it was developed several years ago and hasn't been used since.

@Starbuck5 Starbuck5 added buildconfig Code quality/robustness Code quality and resilience to changes labels Sep 20, 2023
@Starbuck5 Starbuck5 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 20, 2023 08:18
I'm not sure this was ever used, but it was developed several years ago and hasn't been used since.
Copy link
Member

@ankith26 ankith26 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I remember having an older PR with deps updates that did these cleanups, but I like that you opened a dedicated PR as it can get merged more easily.

PS: You are deleting a file in the travis folder, IMO the whole folder can be deleted. The appveyor folder too. We don't really use it, and even if we need to at some point, then we always have git history ;)

Anyways you have my approval. You can take the call on doing the other cleanups in this PR

@Starbuck5
Copy link
Member Author

I'll stick with just conan for now, keep it small. :)

@Starbuck5 Starbuck5 merged commit a7adee5 into pygame-community:main Sep 22, 2023
30 checks passed
@Starbuck5 Starbuck5 deleted the remove-conan branch September 22, 2023 06:20
@ankith26 ankith26 added this to the 2.4.0 milestone Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
buildconfig Code quality/robustness Code quality and resilience to changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants