Headless with fuzzing
#6976
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
@ehsandeep do you have an opinion on how we might see combining headless templates with the new fuzzing capabilities? I don't see a reason that wouldn't work today, but you know more about the headless vs. standard engine than I do! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
We have a open issue for this - projectdiscovery/nuclei#3339 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am thinking if any possibility for creating a headless template where we can fuzz on URL or raw requests: This can be for XSS, and other vulnerabilities. The only thing I want to fuzz for DOM XSS, and DOM clobbering where we don't see any reflection to inject payload.
Like one of a jaeles signature about DOM XSS. Likewise, I want to create like this. If you know kindly help me.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions