Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

is there a recommended attribute name for an abbreviation of an organization's name? #113

Open
mhl opened this issue Sep 9, 2015 · 11 comments

Comments

@mhl
Copy link

mhl commented Sep 9, 2015

For organizations that are political parties, it seems to be common that there is a standard abbreviation for that party name, often an initialism. I don't think the spec suggests a attribute name for such an abbreviation, but it might be useful thing to standardise.

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

Is it worth adding a new property instead of using other_names?

@tmtmtmtm
Copy link
Contributor

tmtmtmtm commented Sep 9, 2015

I would say it's fine to use other_names as long as there's a consistent way of referencing it.

@akuckartz
Copy link

In Germany such abbreviations have a legal foundation and legal inplications. That is one more reason to use a specific property.

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

@akuckartz Can you give an example to help to document the use case?

@LegoStormtroopr
Copy link

We are looking into this as well, and have settled in our internal implementation on code. This is based on the formal "abbreviated name" registered with the Australian Electoral Commission: http://www.aec.gov.au/Parties_and_Representatives/Party_Registration/Registered_parties/index.htm

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

How does code differ semantically from identifier?

@LegoStormtroopr
Copy link

identifier can be repeated, we needed to have a strict one-to-code relation of each political Party having a code, rather than having to specify a generic identifier and then have a controlled vocabulary for each a 'party code' identifier type.

Although, in our implementation we've attached this on a subclass of Organisation called Party, so it still conforms.

@akuckartz
Copy link

@jpmckinney Official short names are for example SPD or F.D.P. (the dots are part of this short name) but longer ones such as "Tierschutzallianz" also exist.

mhl referenced this issue in mysociety/yournextrepresentative Jan 6, 2016
Uses the parties.csv file in elections/cr/data/ to generate the parties
and party sets for the 2016 elections.

It generates a party set for each Canton and then uses the list of
Cantons the party is standing in to add it to the appropriate party
sets.

It also adds the "Cédula Jurídica" ID as an identifier but uses the
slugified name as the party slug as we don't have complete data for the
"Cédula Jurídica".
@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

FYI, perhaps an issue to raise with EU's Core Public Organisation Vocabulary working group.

@akuckartz
Copy link

The CPOV draft currently states this:

5.1.3. Property: identifier [0..n]
Many organisations are referred to by an acronym or some other identifier. For
example, the ECB for the European Central Bank, OLAF for the European Anti-Fraud
Office, and so on. These are formally recognised by the European Commission
which provides a list of such acronyms.

In the RDF release of the CPOV, this property is bound to org:identifier.

A footnote refers to http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/cybernews/abbreviations.htm

I will probably raise an issue for CPOV to suggest adding political parties. EDIT: Done, see https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/cpov/issue/extend-description-identifier

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

jpmckinney commented Dec 7, 2016

ROLL UP

  • Add guidance to use other_names for all/most names
  • Add guidance to use identifiers for official abbreviations (e.g. "Registered Abbreviation" in Australia), with a scheme matching the issuer of abbreviations (e.g. "Australian Electoral Commission")

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants