Replies: 4 comments
-
@Saklad5 Thanks for the question! We probably won't have time to explore such a collection soon as we don't have a use case for it, but we're definitely open to helping get something across the finish line if you're interested in doing the exploratory work of what such a type's API would look like. Are you interested in working on and submitting a PR? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If I end up needing it, certainly. I was thinking it could be similar to the implementation of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The only reason |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@Saklad5 Sounds good! I'm going to convert this to a discussion where design/details could be fleshed out further. We try to keep our issues sections focussed on bug tracking over requested features. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I often find myself using types like
Dictionary<IdentifiableValue.ID, IdentifiableValue>
to hold information. I’d prefer to use aSet
, but I need O(1) subscript lookup.IdentifiedArray
is almost perfect for my needs, but maintains order instead of using set operations. Would it be possible to make an unordered counterpart?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions