Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed #290 -- Importing from django.core.urlresolvers is deprecated in favor of django.urls #291

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 21, 2016

Conversation

felixxm
Copy link
Contributor

@felixxm felixxm commented Oct 29, 2016

RemovedInDjango20Warning: Importing from django.core.urlresolvers is deprecated in favor of django.urls

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 29, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 448a02a on felixxm:issue-290 into aaa4516 on pinax:master.

Copy link
Member

@paltman paltman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this. Just a couple small style corrections and we can get this merged.

@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
from django.core.urlresolvers import reverse
from django.contrib.auth import authenticate, login, logout, get_user_model
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We like to keep the *.contrib imports in their own section of imports after the other django imports.

@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
from django.core.urlresolvers import reverse
from django.contrib.auth import get_user_model
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's keep this in a contrib section of imports after the django imports, please.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

…re.urlresolvers is deprecated in favor of django.urls
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 30, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling d1995af on felixxm:issue-290 into aaa4516 on pinax:master.

@felixxm
Copy link
Contributor Author

felixxm commented Nov 1, 2016

@paltman Done.

Copy link
Member

@paltman paltman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome! Thanks!

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 13, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 8d426c2 on felixxm:issue-290 into d12c367 on pinax:master.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 8d426c2 on felixxm:issue-290 into d12c367 on pinax:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 13, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 8d426c2 on felixxm:issue-290 into d12c367 on pinax:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 21, 2016

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling ede4af4 on felixxm:issue-290 into ** on pinax:master**.

3 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling ede4af4 on felixxm:issue-290 into ** on pinax:master**.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 21, 2016

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling ede4af4 on felixxm:issue-290 into ** on pinax:master**.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 21, 2016

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling ede4af4 on felixxm:issue-290 into ** on pinax:master**.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 21, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling ede4af4 on felixxm:issue-290 into 6615388 on pinax:master.

@paltman paltman merged commit 08859b2 into pinax:master Dec 21, 2016
@felixxm felixxm deleted the issue-290 branch December 22, 2016 09:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants