Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scale order indicators on low dpi #248

Open
Tracked by #515
guilledk opened this issue Jan 21, 2022 · 2 comments
Open
Tracked by #515

Scale order indicators on low dpi #248

guilledk opened this issue Jan 21, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
accounting prolly positioning: the accounting of "what/when (is) owned" bug guille broke it prolly feature-request New feature or request graphics (charting related) geometry chops UI

Comments

@guilledk
Copy link
Contributor

Seems the color order/alert indicators aren't scaled depending on dpi, example: https://i.imgur.com/iFchFZf.png

@guilledk guilledk added bug guille broke it prolly feature-request New feature or request graphics (charting related) geometry chops labels Jan 21, 2022
@guilledk guilledk self-assigned this Jan 21, 2022
@guilledk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also need to scale profit and loss report

@goodboy goodboy added the UI label Jan 22, 2022
@goodboy
Copy link
Contributor

goodboy commented Jan 22, 2022

Yeah, this would make sense since I don't think we have dpi scaling around the paths used to draw all the annotation geos..

A lot of this was pulled from code inside pyqtgraph so we might need to do some scaling tweaks:

Probably worth some tweaking and testing by someone with lodpi 😉

@goodboy goodboy added the accounting prolly positioning: the accounting of "what/when (is) owned" label Mar 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accounting prolly positioning: the accounting of "what/when (is) owned" bug guille broke it prolly feature-request New feature or request graphics (charting related) geometry chops UI
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants