You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I want to use Word Obfuscation in both directions - I want events from Outlook and Google to appear in each as 'Busy', rather than just a singular direction
Describe the solution you'd like
Allow the option to set Word Obfuscation in both directions, the same as the bilateral sync
Describe alternatives you've considered
I've considered running two instances of OGCS, but this gets messy keeping track of both config files and ensuring the two instances don't interfere with each other
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Surely that will just result in everything with the title of "Busy"!? I'm assuming you meant the subject of the calendar item, not the status/availability when you say you want each to appear as busy.
Do you mean you want the synced copy to be obfuscated, but the original item in whichever calendar that is created, to retain it's original subject? This would then actually follow the same logic that sync of the status/availability does, so this should be possible...
The second option is exactly what I'm trying to achieve.
Original calendar entries retain their details, the sync'd copies of each entry just show as 'Busy' and act as a blocker for scheduling purposes.
i.e all of my Outlook calendar entries appear with full details, but the sync'd copies into Google Calendar all appear as 'Busy' slots, and vise versa.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I want to use Word Obfuscation in both directions - I want events from Outlook and Google to appear in each as 'Busy', rather than just a singular direction
Describe the solution you'd like
Allow the option to set Word Obfuscation in both directions, the same as the bilateral sync
Describe alternatives you've considered
I've considered running two instances of OGCS, but this gets messy keeping track of both config files and ensuring the two instances don't interfere with each other
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: