Repository navigation
feat: trigger Claude on CodeRabbit and Copilot review comments - #198
Conversation
The pull_request_review_comment condition previously required OWNER/MEMBER/COLLABORATOR author_association, which excluded both bots. Adds coderabbitai[bot] and Copilot as allowed senders so Claude automatically addresses their inline findings. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To continue reviewing without waiting, purchase usage credits in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates the reusable Claude Code workflow gating so that inline PR review comments authored by CodeRabbit and GitHub Copilot can trigger the Claude job, in addition to comments from trusted human collaborators.
Changes:
- Extends the
pull_request_review_commentjobif:condition to allowcoderabbitai[bot]andCopilotlogins to trigger runs. - Keeps the existing guard that prevents responding to
claude[bot]comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| @@ -25,7 +25,8 @@ jobs: | |||
| contains(fromJson('["OWNER","MEMBER","COLLABORATOR"]'), github.event.comment.author_association)) || | |||
| (github.event_name == 'pull_request_review_comment' && | |||
The pull_request_review_comment condition previously required OWNER/MEMBER/COLLABORATOR author_association, which excluded both bots. Adds coderabbitai[bot] and Copilot as allowed senders so Claude automatically addresses their inline findings. Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Summary
pull_request_review_commenttrigger condition inclaude-code-reusable.ymlto includecoderabbitai[bot]andCopilotalongside the existingOWNER/MEMBER/COLLABORATORcheckif:evaluated false forauthor_association: NONE(CodeRabbit) andauthor_association: CONTRIBUTOR(Copilot)Why
CodeRabbit and Copilot post actionable inline findings on PRs. Without this change, Claude never sees them and they accumulate unaddressed (as seen on PR #167).
Loop risk is low: both bots re-review only on pushes, not on comment replies, so Claude responding to a bot comment won't re-trigger those bots.
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code