docs: refresh org READMEs (automated)

[don-petry]

Automated README refresh

Regenerated the org meta-repo README(s) in petry-projects/.github from live org state
(repository list, standards docs, agent profiles, and installed frameworks).

Generated by the weekly readme-refresh workflow in petry-projects/.github-private.
Review the diff — curated prose is preserved; only missing/stale facts are corrected.

Action needed: these repos have empty GitHub descriptions — set them on the repo page so future refreshes can enrich the table: TalkTerm, markets

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added the Standards Versioning standard to the engineering standards documentation.
  • Documented tag formats, release procedures, N-1 resolvability, ownership of version updates, and opt-in/opt-out guidance.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates README.md and profile/README.md to document and link to the new 'Standards Versioning' policy (standards-versioning.md), which outlines the standards artifact versioning and release process. There are no review comments, and I have no feedback to provide.

[don-petry]

Dev-Lead — fix-bot-comment (no-changes)

Agent reasoning

Issues addressed: 0
Actionable findings: None
Status: Ready to merge pending outstanding CI checks
```

[don-petry]

Acknowledged — this is a Codex usage-limit notice for the code-review bot, not a finding about this PR. No code change is warranted; the PR only adds documentation links to standards-versioning.md. No action needed.

[don-petry]

Acknowledged — this is a Qodo trial-ended/billing notice, not a finding about this PR. Nothing here requires a code change. No action needed.

[don-petry]

Acknowledged — this is CodeRabbit’s auto-generated walkthrough/summary, which explicitly reports "No actionable comments were generated in the recent review." It is a neutral overview of the doc-only diff, not a change request. No action needed.

[don-petry]

Dev-Lead — waiting on PR blockers (intent: fix-reviews)

PR: #1161
No changes were committed, but the PR still has blocking checks or reviews (failing or cancelled checks, or changes-requested reviews). The retry cron will re-attempt automatically. Next attempt after: 2026-09-21T16:37:12Z

[donpetry-bot]

pr-review approved on PARTIAL advisory evidence: 2/6 required advisory bots reported before the gate's head-age-timeout fallback proceeded. Recorded for the miss-rate metric (#1596).

[donpetry-bot]

Automated review — APPROVED ✓

Risk: LOW
Reviewed commit: 18f2ebcf191af6f8e5e3b5e82b3f997b14798927
Cascade: triage → deep (triage: haiku 4.5 [sonnet 5] → deep: opus 4.8 [sonnet 5] + duck: o4-mini → audit: fable 5)

Summary

Automated weekly README refresh adding two documentation links (one table row in README.md, one bullet in profile/README.md) to the new standards-versioning.md policy. Change is docs-only and behavior-preserving, matches the exact format of adjacent standards entries, and the linked doc was verified to exist (5727 bytes) at head so the links are not dead. No safety hard-stops; advisory bots raised nothing actionable. The only triage signal was missing structured description sections (risk/test-plan/rollback/monitoring), which are N/A for a trivial automated docs-link refresh and not grounds to block a correct, consistent LOW change.

Findings

• info: New Engineering Standards table row and Standards & Practices bullet follow the existing entry format (cf. ruleset-remediation-runbook); naming and column/summary structure are consistent.
• info: Both links target standards/standards-versioning.md, which was verified to exist in petry-projects/.github at the head SHA (5727 bytes). No dead links.
• info: Triage escalated on DESCRIPTION_MISSING (4/5 required sections). For an automated docs-link refresh these sections are not meaningful; the PR body adequately explains the change (weekly readme-refresh workflow). Not treated as a blocking gate failure.

---

Reviewed by the PR-review cascade (triage: haiku 4.5 [sonnet 5] → deep: opus 4.8 [sonnet 5] + duck: o4-mini → audit: fable 5). Reply if you need a human review.

[don-petry]

No description provided.

[don-petry]

Dev-Lead — fix-reviews (no-changes)

Agent reasoning

Addressed 0 threads:
- (no open review threads)
- (all PR issue comments already resolved or are our own automation replies — no disposition needed)
Test verification: N/A — no code changed (working tree clean, HEAD unchanged at 18f2ebc)
Files changed: none
```

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud