You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 2, 2020. It is now read-only.
I don't remember why it was excluded and I can't think of a reason why it should be off the top of my head (the "publishing" support hasn't gotten much love in a long time).
If it isn't causing problems then the exclusion should be removed.
Okay! The reason I asked was because a CI build of mine broke for an app using azure-functions-rs, because another dependency I use had a breaking change in a patch version.
Sort of perfect storm of someone not properly following semver, coupled with the Cargo.lock not being copied into the Docker-image being built. It was a bit of a head-scratcher trying to figure out.
By the way, I noticed while doing the example code for #488 that the root Cargo.lock was being altered when building the example-code. Maybe that has something to do with it?
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hi! Thanks for the wonderful crate.
Just a quick question, why is
Cargo.lock
ignored in the copy operation over to the Docker-image by default?As seen here:
azure-functions-rs/azure-functions-sdk/src/templates/new-app/dockerignore.hbs
Line 2 in 06ca809
I can just remove it of course, but wondering if there is any benefit to keeping it ignored that I have not seen.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: