Skip to content

Conversation

@egegunes
Copy link
Contributor

@egegunes egegunes commented May 26, 2025

K8SPSMDB-1262 Powered by Pull Request Badge

CHANGE DESCRIPTION

Test passed on Openshift: https://cloud.cd.percona.com/view/PSMDB/job/psmdbo-openshift-2/34/console

18:34:27  
18:34:27  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
18:34:27  test passed
18:34:27  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
18:34:27  

CHECKLIST

Jira

  • Is the Jira ticket created and referenced properly?
  • Does the Jira ticket have the proper statuses for documentation (Needs Doc) and QA (Needs QA)?
  • Does the Jira ticket link to the proper milestone (Fix Version field)?

Tests

  • Is an E2E test/test case added for the new feature/change?
  • Are unit tests added where appropriate?
  • Are OpenShift compare files changed for E2E tests (compare/*-oc.yml)?

Config/Logging/Testability

  • Are all needed new/changed options added to default YAML files?
  • Are all needed new/changed options added to the Helm Chart?
  • Did we add proper logging messages for operator actions?
  • Did we ensure compatibility with the previous version or cluster upgrade process?
  • Does the change support oldest and newest supported MongoDB version?
  • Does the change support oldest and newest supported Kubernetes version?

@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/L 100-499 lines label May 26, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the tests label May 26, 2025
@hors hors added this to the v1.21.0 milestone May 27, 2025
@JNKPercona
Copy link
Collaborator

Test name Status
arbiter passed
balancer passed
cross-site-sharded passed
custom-replset-name passed
custom-tls passed
custom-users-roles passed
custom-users-roles-sharded passed
data-at-rest-encryption passed
data-sharded passed
demand-backup passed
demand-backup-eks-credentials-irsa passed
demand-backup-fs passed
demand-backup-incremental passed
demand-backup-incremental-sharded passed
demand-backup-physical-parallel passed
demand-backup-physical-aws passed
demand-backup-physical-azure passed
demand-backup-physical-gcp passed
demand-backup-physical-minio passed
demand-backup-physical-sharded-parallel passed
demand-backup-physical-sharded-aws passed
demand-backup-physical-sharded-azure passed
demand-backup-physical-sharded-gcp passed
demand-backup-physical-sharded-minio passed
demand-backup-sharded passed
expose-sharded passed
finalizer passed
ignore-labels-annotations passed
init-deploy passed
ldap passed
ldap-tls passed
limits passed
liveness passed
mongod-major-upgrade passed
mongod-major-upgrade-sharded passed
monitoring-2-0 passed
monitoring-pmm3 passed
multi-cluster-service passed
multi-storage passed
non-voting-and-hidden passed
one-pod passed
operator-self-healing-chaos passed
pitr passed
pitr-physical passed
pitr-sharded passed
pitr-physical-backup-source passed
preinit-updates passed
pvc-resize passed
recover-no-primary passed
replset-overrides passed
rs-shard-migration passed
scaling passed
scheduled-backup failure
security-context passed
self-healing-chaos passed
service-per-pod passed
serviceless-external-nodes passed
smart-update passed
split-horizon passed
stable-resource-version passed
storage passed
tls-issue-cert-manager passed
upgrade passed
upgrade-consistency passed
upgrade-consistency-sharded-tls passed
upgrade-sharded passed
users passed
version-service passed
We run 68 out of 68

commit: ec70537
image: perconalab/percona-server-mongodb-operator:PR-1945-ec70537d

Copy link
Contributor

@gkech gkech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should move this PR out of draft state I guess

@egegunes egegunes marked this pull request as ready for review May 29, 2025 10:41
containers:
- name: nfs-server
image: k8s.gcr.io/volume-nfs:0.8
image: egegunes/nfs-server:0.9.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we use the image from your account?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

old image is outdated, i think there's no harm in using the image from my account

@hors hors merged commit 9efc64b into main May 30, 2025
13 of 15 checks passed
@hors hors deleted the K8SPSMDB-1262 branch May 30, 2025 08:36
egegunes added a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/L 100-499 lines tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants