Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Training time and pre-trained models #26

Open
junjun621 opened this issue May 13, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Training time and pre-trained models #26

junjun621 opened this issue May 13, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@junjun621
Copy link

Hello Liang, thanks for sharing the code of your interesting work. I have some questions.

  1. I I train your model for 16384 points on RTX 3090 with a batch size of 18. I trained it with cd loss instead of emd loss. It took around 1 hour to train one epoch. How long does it take for you to train the model?
  2. If possible, could you provide the pre-trained model with 16384 points ?
    Thanks in advance.
@paul007pl
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for asking. Actually, I have been asked many times about the training time with 16384 points as well as the pre-trained model. Unfortunately, it is indeed time-consuming to train the model with 16384 points, and my pre-trained models are lost due to changing the workstation cluster nodes.
When I was doing this task (2 years ago), I mostly conduct experiments with 2048 points or 4096 points, which could finish the training in around one day with a V100 GPU. The results with 2048 points are usually positively related to the results with 16384 points. I did not train many models with 16384 points due to its time-consuming fact (a few days). For the same reason, the following works all prefer to use 2048 points in their experiments. You could also check:
https://github.com/wutong16/Density_aware_Chamfer_Distance
https://github.com/ZhaoyangLyu/Point_Diffusion_Refinement
Perhaps, you could focus on 2048 points first, or you could consider designing efficient operations to ease the training (this is a true research gap).

@houdezaiwu2019
Copy link

However, in mechanical engineering, we should have more points to recover CAD model with high quality.Too small points can do nothing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants