Skip to content

Conversation

@nikhilsinhaparseable
Copy link
Contributor

@nikhilsinhaparseable nikhilsinhaparseable commented Dec 8, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Bumped package version to 2.5.3
    • Updated UI asset references and checksums to align with the latest build

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Walkthrough

This PR bumps the package version from 2.5.2 to 2.5.3 and updates the UI assets metadata with a new build.zip URL and corresponding SHA1 hash. No dependencies, features, or other configuration values are modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Version & UI assets release update
Cargo.toml
Version bumped to 2.5.3; parseable_ui assets-url and assets-sha1 updated to reference v2.5.3 build artifacts

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Straightforward version and metadata update with no logic or structural changes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • nitisht

Poem

🐰 hop hop hop, the version's grown so fine,
v2.5.3 now shines—the assets all align!
A hash, a zip, a sprinkle of precision,
Release-day magic! The rabbit's mission. ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning No pull request description was provided by the author, despite the repository having a required description template with multiple sections. Add a description following the template, including the 'Description' section explaining the purpose of the release update and the checkbox items indicating testing and documentation status.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: updating Cargo.toml for release v2.5.3, which matches the version bump and asset metadata updates shown in the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b08f243 and 57d1562.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (10)
  • GitHub Check: Quest Smoke and Load Tests for Standalone deployments
  • GitHub Check: Quest Smoke and Load Tests for Distributed deployments
  • GitHub Check: Build Default x86_64-pc-windows-msvc
  • GitHub Check: Build Default aarch64-apple-darwin
  • GitHub Check: Build Default aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
  • GitHub Check: coverage
  • GitHub Check: Build Default x86_64-apple-darwin
  • GitHub Check: Build Default x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
  • GitHub Check: Build Kafka aarch64-apple-darwin
  • GitHub Check: Build Kafka x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Cargo.toml (1)

3-3: Verify SHA1 hash and S3 artifact accessibility before release.

The version bump to 2.5.3 is correct, and the UI assets metadata has been updated with the corresponding version. However, the SHA1 hash af8e12b7ab893649bb48614a7389eab05a3a8500 and the build artifact at https://parseable-prism-build.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/v2.5.3/build.zip must be verified to ensure integrity.

Confirm:

  1. The SHA1 hash matches the actual build.zip artifact
  2. The S3 artifact is accessible and properly deployed before release

Also applies to: 163-164


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@nikhilsinhaparseable nikhilsinhaparseable merged commit 88f15ae into parseablehq:main Dec 8, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant