#14854: DatetimeIndex compiled together in test_datetime.py #15266
Conversation
Codecov Report@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #15266 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 86.33% 86.33%
=======================================
Files 139 139
Lines 51149 51149
=======================================
Hits 44157 44157
Misses 6992 6992Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
ok, so the resulting test file is just too big and unweildy. let's split it out to a sub-dir, IOW
then split into a number of files (you can start by splitting each class to a separate named file for instance) |
|
nice start! name things like
|
|
Thanks. Though, What about the questions I raised or is this PR ready? |
no |
essentially yes these should be moved. |
|
certainly would like to split up test_datetime.py Ideally split along class lines (though maybe not much there, it might already be a big class). So can come back and do that later. |
|
also need to add an entry in |
|
Now only remaining thing, it seems, is the merging of those 2 different function definitions by same name ( |
|
@TrigonaMinima sure, let's get this passing. Then pls make a list of what changes you think could / should be made. We want to move and then in other commits, fix/change etc. |
|
@jreback I am sorry, I didn't understand you. Changes like? Merging those two functions and what else? Also, other commits under this PR only, right? |
|
Okay so here's the list I came up with
|
|
@TrigonaMinima if you can get this passing (iow fix the flake errors) would be great. |
|
@jreback the build in Python2.7 is giving errors in all the tests in Any suggestions? Changing the name of the directory is the easiest fix I can think of. |
|
@TrigonaMinima change the directory name to datetimes I think will work |
|
FYI you can do
|
|
Yeah. I read the full contributing guide yesterday. Though, this module name problem wasn't showing up in the output of the command. Which is the right behavior given this isn't exactly a pep8 issue. |
|
@TrigonaMinima yeah, for some reason travis catches slightly different things that local flake8, not really sure why (its only this particular pep, missing a whole module import) |
| def test_round(self): | ||
|
|
||
| # round | ||
| dt = Timestamp('20130101 09:10:11') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
so this is something to add to the list.
I want to create a pandas/tests/scalars/test_timestamp.py (and test_timedelta.py). So anything specifically Timestamp related will go there.
this can be next iteration though.
| class TestDatetimeIndex(tm.TestCase): | ||
| _multiprocess_can_split_ = True | ||
|
|
||
| def test_construction_with_alt(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
so ok with splitting this up a bit now. e.g. test_construction (and when you do, copy the class (name), and leave the methods alone (even though they say test_construction_* for now that's ok))
| freq='B') | ||
| tm.assert_index_equal(result, expected) | ||
|
|
||
| def test_astype(self): |
| self.assertRaises(ValueError, idx.astype, 'datetime64') | ||
| self.assertRaises(ValueError, idx.astype, 'datetime64[D]') | ||
|
|
||
| def test_where_other(self): |
| tm.assert_index_equal(result, exp) | ||
| self.assertEqual(result.freq, 'D') | ||
|
|
||
| def test_fillna_datetime64(self): |
| dtype=object) | ||
| self.assert_index_equal(idx.fillna('x'), exp) | ||
|
|
||
| def test_difference_freq(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
test_setops. (include union, intersection, difference routines)
|
|
||
| self.assertEqual(idx.nanosecond[0], t1.nanosecond) | ||
|
|
||
| def test_constructor_coverage(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
another one for test_construction
| non_datetime = Index(list('abc')) | ||
| self.assertFalse(idx.equals(list(non_datetime))) | ||
|
|
||
| def test_union_coverage(self): |
| self.assertEqual(result.name, df.index[2]) | ||
|
|
||
| # GH 10699 | ||
| def test_datetime64_with_DateOffset(self): |
| self.assertTrue(result.freq is None) | ||
| self.assertEqual(result.tz, expected.tz) | ||
|
|
||
| def test_delete(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
put insert and delete into test_indexing
| self.assertEqual(result.freq, expected.freq) | ||
| self.assertEqual(result.tz, expected.tz) | ||
|
|
||
| def test_take(self): |
…atetime.py (GH14854)
…test_datetime.py (GH14854)
|
thanks @TrigonaMinima ! ok I am going to push a scalar directory now that is empty, but please continue on moving things! |
xref pandas-dev#14854 Author: TrigonaMinima <[email protected]> Closes pandas-dev#15266 from TrigonaMinima/issue-14854-datetime and squashes the following commits: 6ee2bd9 [TrigonaMinima] TST: Splitting test_datetime.py into smaller chunks (gh14854) 415a748 [TrigonaMinima] TST: Moving DatetimeIndex related tests from test_timeseries.py and flake8 fixes c43c7de [TrigonaMinima] TST: proper naming of files 458d141 [TrigonaMinima] TST: splitting test_datetime.py 1ff0819 [TrigonaMinima] TST: fix flake8 errors - test_datetime.py (GH14854) 9311161 [TrigonaMinima] TST: reorg of DatetimeIndex tests from tseries/tests/test_base.py to test_datetime.py (GH14854) 54421a5 [TrigonaMinima] TST: reorg of DatetimeIndex tests from test_datetimelike.py to test_datetime.py (GH14854) f83814b [TrigonaMinima] TST: reorg of DatetimeIndex tests from test_timeseries.py to test_datetime.py
3 participants
Partially completes #14854
Grouped all the
DatetimeIndexrelated tests under one file -pandas/tests/indexes/test_datetime.py.Tests reorganized
There were some tests in other classes which could be shifted to the as well. From
pandas/pandas/tseries/tests/test_timeseries.pyTestTimeSeriesTestDatetime64TestDatetime64TestDatetime64TestDatetime64Should these also be included in the
test_datetime.pyin their respective classes or let them be?In
pandas/tests/indexes/test_datetimelike.pythere were some tests which were using theDatetimeLikeclass defined there. I could import that class in thetest_datetime.pyand transfer the wholeTestDatetimeIndexbut should it be done?Mostly passes
git diff upstream/master | flake8 --difftest_intersectionandtest_unionfunctions?Further TODOs from the following discussion and the #14854 under datetime
Split
datetimes/test_datetime.pyinto smaller chunksIn
datetimes/test_misc.pylines from 167-202 should go under timestamp related tests (?)Transfer of function (
test_datetimeindex_accessors) from classTestDatetime64indatetimes/test_misc.pyto classTestDatetimeIndexOpsofdatetime/test_ops.py(?)Function
test_roundfromdatetimes/test_datetime.pytopandas/tests/scalars/test_timestamp.py. (and test_timedelta.py). So anything specifically Timestamp related will go there.