-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Generic components in Blueprint #3661
Comments
The question becomes what goals are you trying to achieve with your "Container-esque" components that directly relate to Blueprint? If you were to write a |
@dmackerman Well, I was thinking about something really basic; things like centering elements (with an optional Still, maybe one generic component that centers it’s children with a margin of |
You're right, Blueprint doesn't provide any generic layout components out of the box. There is one container component, |
@adidahiya I’m sorry for asking questions not exactly relevant to blueprint, but do you have some suggestions for a generic flexbox-based lightweight (non-styling) React component library that can be used with blueprint? |
@pcr910303 I am using React Grid System with Blueprint and so far I have not seen any issues. |
@gkanellopoulos Thanks for your suggestions! 👍 |
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
Environment
Question
I was wondering about generic layout components in Blueprint.
For example, 'Container'-esque classes are provided in
Bulma, components are provided in material-ui, etc.
Does blueprint expect users to roll out their own layout components? Or is it me not noticing such components?
I have found out that blueprint doesn’t provide a grid system at the variables section(not a good place IMHO), does the same apply to generic components?
(The reason why I am using blueprintjs, not other libraries I have included in my comments is because of not only asthetics but also the fact that blueprint exposes all classes, since it allows myself to build components with the same look-and-feel with the components blueprint provides.
If there are classes that are exposed for such generic situations, I will gladly roll out my own components.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: