You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 21, 2024. It is now read-only.
Our next goal for this prototype is to get <User> to use this for debugging failed datums; they specifically mentioned debugging failed datums as a sticking point that they're struggling with, and hopefully this will significantly reduce their iteration time when doing it
Following up with our conversation on this yesterday:
run_like_a_pipeline should, at the minimum, allow you to specify a (pipeline, datum), download the files in that datum, and mount them into a container running locally (also in that local container: /pfs/out should be a bind-mounted tmp dir where you can see the output from processing that datum)
If users specify code=pl_body, then the container in (1) is some bog-standard python container, and the command becomes, essentially python -c <function body>, a la Kubeflow function-based components. Otherwise, we could use the pipeline image, or maybe allow users to specify their own python image and run their code in that.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
An example usage:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: