Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Don't you think that the module should be named just pipewire_subprocess? #21

Open
KOLANICH opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Don't you think that the module should be named just pipewire_subprocess? #21

KOLANICH opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@KOLANICH
Copy link

KOLANICH commented May 15, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Initially I was thinking it is bindings directly interacting to pipewire graph (so I can feed raw data to it), so proposed it to be renamed to just pipewire. But now I see it just calls CLI utilites, so is limited, so I propose it to be renamed into pipewire_subprocess to make it clear.
@KOLANICH KOLANICH changed the title Don't you think that the module should be named just pipewire? Don't you think that the module should be named just pipewire_shell? May 15, 2023
@KOLANICH KOLANICH changed the title Don't you think that the module should be named just pipewire_shell? Don't you think that the module should be named just pipewire_subprocess? May 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@KOLANICH