diff --git a/crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/eslint/no_with.rs b/crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/eslint/no_with.rs
index 90d8d548f2e35..50491fc977594 100644
--- a/crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/eslint/no_with.rs
+++ b/crates/oxc_linter/src/rules/eslint/no_with.rs
@@ -17,11 +17,17 @@ pub struct NoWith;
 declare_oxc_lint!(
     /// ### What it does
     ///
-    /// Disallow `with` statements
+    /// Disallow [`with`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/with) statements.
     ///
     /// ### Why is this bad?
     ///
-    /// The with statement is potentially problematic because it adds members of an object to the current scope, making it impossible to tell what a variable inside the block actually refers to.
+    /// The with statement is potentially problematic because it adds members
+    /// of an object to the current scope, making it impossible to tell what a
+    /// variable inside the block actually refers to.
+    ///
+    /// It is generally considered a bad practice and is forbidden in strict mode.
+    ///
+    /// This rule is not necessary in TypeScript code if `alwaysStrict` is enabled.
     ///
     /// ### Examples
     ///
@@ -48,7 +54,19 @@ impl Rule for NoWith {
 fn test() {
     use crate::tester::Tester;
 
-    let pass = vec!["foo.bar()"];
+    let pass = vec![
+        "foo.bar();",
+        "/* with keyword in block comment */ foo();",
+        "// with in line comment\nfoo();",
+        "var obj = { with: 1 }; obj.with;",
+        "obj.with = 1;",
+        "class C { with() {} } new C().with();",
+        "console.log('with in string');",
+        "console.log(`with in template`);",
+        "const o = {}; o['with'] = 2;",
+        "const p = { ['with']: 3 }; p.with;",
+        "const { with: w } = { with: 4 }; w;",
+    ];
 
     let fail = vec!["with(foo) { bar() }"];