You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As part of the official chartering of the OpenSSF Scorecard project, the @ossf/scorecard-maintainers made a few decisions:
(in discussions with @jeffmendoza) to include Allstar as a project within the OpenSSF Scorecard ecosystem
to include @jeffmendoza as a member of bootstrap Steering Committee for OpenSSF Scorecard
We've asked @SecurityCRob (in his capacity as a TAC member) if there are any process requirements in transitioning a project to another WG and it sounds like the only requirements are to:
reach an agreement between the maintainers of the relevant projects
inform the outgoing Working Group of this decision
This issue is intended to:
constitute formal notice that this WG transfer is occuring
capture any WG-level items that need to be completed as part of this transfer
Your two points look good. Outside of the maintainers agreeing and then notifying the two involved working groups (I informed the BEST this week about the Allstar move potential) and updating documentation (WG readme's) you should be good to go! SUPER happy to see the synergy between Allstar and Scorecard and am eager to see what awesome stuff you all can achieve together now!
Your two points look good. Outside of the maintainers agreeing and then notifying the two involved working groups
(I informed the BEST this week about the Allstar move potential)
As part of the official chartering of the OpenSSF Scorecard project, the @ossf/scorecard-maintainers made a few decisions:
We've asked @SecurityCRob (in his capacity as a TAC member) if there are any process requirements in transitioning a project to another WG and it sounds like the only requirements are to:
This issue is intended to:
cc: @ossf/wg-securing-critical-projects @afmarcum
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: