You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First off, I want to say a huge thank you for the incredible work you’ve done! Supabase is a fantastic platform, and I really appreciate the time and effort you put into it. It has been incredibly helpful to me and many others, and I see so much potential moving forward.
However, there’s something that has been on my mind, and I’d like to bring it to your attention: the discrepancy between the open-source and the commercial version of Supabase. For me – and I believe many others in the open-source community – open-source means having the ability to host and run the exact same project on our own that is also being offered as a cloud service. This should be the fundamental principle of open-source.
Unfortunately, that doesn’t seem to be the case with Supabase right now. Key features like multi-project management, replication, user management, and more are missing in the open-source version, as illustrated in this screenshot:
This leads to disappointment, as when a project is promoted as open-source, I expect that it’s possible to self-host the entire project, including all of its features, without limitations. Commercial services such as support or a managed cloud offering should be additional options, but the core features shouldn’t be locked behind a paywall. The current approach feels more like an “open-paywall,” which is unfortunately a trend we’re seeing more often in the open-source space.
A great example of how it can be done differently is Coolify. Even though it’s a relatively new project, it offers a wide range of features and is truly fully open-source, without any restrictions. It shows that you can offer a powerful product that is both commercially viable and fully open-source, and the community really appreciates this approach. Coolify has truly embraced the open-source spirit, and I wish Supabase would move more in that direction.
Despite this criticism, I want to emphasize that I think Supabase is an amazing platform, and I hope my concerns are taken as constructive feedback. I believe these points are worth discussing internally to further strengthen the open-source version and maintain a good balance between open-source and commercial offerings.
Thank you for your time and for the great work you’re doing!
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi Supabase Team,
First off, I want to say a huge thank you for the incredible work you’ve done! Supabase is a fantastic platform, and I really appreciate the time and effort you put into it. It has been incredibly helpful to me and many others, and I see so much potential moving forward.
However, there’s something that has been on my mind, and I’d like to bring it to your attention: the discrepancy between the open-source and the commercial version of Supabase. For me – and I believe many others in the open-source community – open-source means having the ability to host and run the exact same project on our own that is also being offered as a cloud service. This should be the fundamental principle of open-source.
Unfortunately, that doesn’t seem to be the case with Supabase right now. Key features like multi-project management, replication, user management, and more are missing in the open-source version, as illustrated in this screenshot:
This leads to disappointment, as when a project is promoted as open-source, I expect that it’s possible to self-host the entire project, including all of its features, without limitations. Commercial services such as support or a managed cloud offering should be additional options, but the core features shouldn’t be locked behind a paywall. The current approach feels more like an “open-paywall,” which is unfortunately a trend we’re seeing more often in the open-source space.
A great example of how it can be done differently is Coolify. Even though it’s a relatively new project, it offers a wide range of features and is truly fully open-source, without any restrictions. It shows that you can offer a powerful product that is both commercially viable and fully open-source, and the community really appreciates this approach. Coolify has truly embraced the open-source spirit, and I wish Supabase would move more in that direction.
Despite this criticism, I want to emphasize that I think Supabase is an amazing platform, and I hope my concerns are taken as constructive feedback. I believe these points are worth discussing internally to further strengthen the open-source version and maintain a good balance between open-source and commercial offerings.
Thank you for your time and for the great work you’re doing!
Best regards,
nyxb
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions