You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[product_id] and [subcomponent_id] MAY specify sets of products or components, for example:
● Every product or component owned by a supplier
● A product family or product line
● Version ranges
● A specific branch
It makes sense to use version ranges. Otherwise, VEX documents must be updated every time product or subcomponent version changes.
"Any versions" probably can be described by omitting the version since the version is optional in PURL. e.g. pkg:maven/org.apache.xmlgraphics/batik-anim
How about version ranges? I may be missing something.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since we are favoring the use purls across the spec, I think we should recognize and implement in our libraries the purl vers: ranges specification. It has not merged yet but it seems to have been frozen for a couple of years now and it is already baked into the CycloneDX 1.4 spec. My only worry here is that we would be producing purls that may not be universally recognized, thoughts?
I'm looking for an OpenVEX-compliant way to list a CVE/vulnerability in a VEX report twice, once for a version of the product that is impacted, and once for a newer version of the same product that is Fixed. I want to show, in a single VEX report, that one version of our product is impacted and the next version is fixed.
Will the version ranges discussed here be able to address this use case?
Adding on to the question above..
For some CVE if we have information on both the impacted and the fixed version, can we specify this in the 'action_statement' field under statements? Something like "Fixed in version x.y"?
Reference to OpenVEX Specification.
Is there any way to specify the version range in product_id and subcomponent_id?
The minimum requirements for VEX denote as below:
It makes sense to use version ranges. Otherwise, VEX documents must be updated every time product or subcomponent version changes.
And the OpenVEX spec recommends PURLs.
"Any versions" probably can be described by omitting the version since the version is optional in PURL. e.g.
pkg:maven/org.apache.xmlgraphics/batik-anim
How about version ranges? I may be missing something.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: