Skip to content

Conversation

@dmihalcik-virtru
Copy link
Member

Proposed Changes

Checklist

  • I have added or updated unit tests
  • I have added or updated integration tests (if appropriate)
  • I have added or updated documentation

Testing Instructions

@dmihalcik-virtru dmihalcik-virtru requested review from a team as code owners June 25, 2025 19:36
@github-actions github-actions bot added the comp:policy Policy Configuration ( attributes, subject mappings, resource mappings, kas registry) label Jun 25, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @dmihalcik-virtru, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces an update to the Key Access Server (KAS) registry's protocol definition to allow for the use of the 521 elliptic curve. By modifying the validation rules for key algorithms, it ensures that systems can now correctly process and utilize keys based on this specific curve, enhancing the cryptographic flexibility of the service.

Highlights

  • Key Algorithm Support: Expanded the key_algorithm validation in ListKeysRequest within service/policy/kasregistry/key_access_server_registry.proto to include support for an additional elliptic curve type, specifically enabling the use of the 521 curve.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A new curve allowed, Validation checks updated, Security grows strong.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to allow the use of the P-521 curve by updating the validation rule for ListKeysRequest. The change is correct for this request, but appears to be incomplete as other requests like CreateKeyRequest and RotateKeyRequest still have validation rules that would prevent the use of this curve. I've also suggested improving a code comment for clarity and adding a test case to cover the new functionality.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results, click to expand

Benchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:

Metric Value
Approved Decision Requests 5000
Denied Decision Requests 0
Total Time 512.133003ms

Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:

Metric Value
Approved Decision Requests 5000
Denied Decision Requests 0
Total Time 329.405594ms

Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or Failed

Bulk Benchmark Results

Metric Value
Total Decrypts 100
Successful Decrypts 100
Failed Decrypts 0
Total Time 342.584248ms
Throughput 291.90 requests/second

TDF3 Benchmark Results:

Metric Value
Total Requests 5000
Successful Requests 5000
Failed Requests 0
Concurrent Requests 50
Total Time 36.987968298s
Average Latency 368.364706ms
Throughput 135.18 requests/second

NANOTDF Benchmark Results:

Metric Value
Total Requests 5000
Successful Requests 5000
Failed Requests 0
Concurrent Requests 50
Total Time 26.192225391s
Average Latency 261.079328ms
Throughput 190.90 requests/second

@dmihalcik-virtru dmihalcik-virtru requested a review from a team as a code owner June 25, 2025 21:57
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results, click to expand

Benchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:

Metric Value
Approved Decision Requests 5000
Denied Decision Requests 0
Total Time 531.713475ms

Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:

Metric Value
Approved Decision Requests 5000
Denied Decision Requests 0
Total Time 345.607826ms

Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or Failed

Bulk Benchmark Results

Metric Value
Total Decrypts 100
Successful Decrypts 100
Failed Decrypts 0
Total Time 348.203313ms
Throughput 287.19 requests/second

TDF3 Benchmark Results:

Metric Value
Total Requests 5000
Successful Requests 5000
Failed Requests 0
Concurrent Requests 50
Total Time 36.70180736s
Average Latency 364.283812ms
Throughput 136.23 requests/second

NANOTDF Benchmark Results:

Metric Value
Total Requests 5000
Successful Requests 5000
Failed Requests 0
Concurrent Requests 50
Total Time 26.197764625s
Average Latency 261.218018ms
Throughput 190.86 requests/second

elizabethhealy
elizabethhealy previously approved these changes Jun 25, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results, click to expand

Benchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:

Metric Value
Approved Decision Requests 5000
Denied Decision Requests 0
Total Time 505.313816ms

Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:

Metric Value
Approved Decision Requests 5000
Denied Decision Requests 0
Total Time 338.440411ms

Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or Failed

Bulk Benchmark Results

Metric Value
Total Decrypts 100
Successful Decrypts 100
Failed Decrypts 0
Total Time 341.733262ms
Throughput 292.63 requests/second

TDF3 Benchmark Results:

Metric Value
Total Requests 5000
Successful Requests 5000
Failed Requests 0
Concurrent Requests 50
Total Time 36.668962493s
Average Latency 365.1359ms
Throughput 136.36 requests/second

NANOTDF Benchmark Results:

Metric Value
Total Requests 5000
Successful Requests 5000
Failed Requests 0
Concurrent Requests 50
Total Time 25.755175752s
Average Latency 256.492628ms
Throughput 194.14 requests/second

pflynn-virtru
pflynn-virtru previously approved these changes Jun 25, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results, click to expand

Benchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:

Metric Value
Approved Decision Requests 5000
Denied Decision Requests 0
Total Time 503.683792ms

Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:

Metric Value
Approved Decision Requests 5000
Denied Decision Requests 0
Total Time 326.470791ms

Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or Failed

Bulk Benchmark Results

Metric Value
Total Decrypts 100
Successful Decrypts 100
Failed Decrypts 0
Total Time 363.56747ms
Throughput 275.05 requests/second

TDF3 Benchmark Results:

Metric Value
Total Requests 5000
Successful Requests 5000
Failed Requests 0
Concurrent Requests 50
Total Time 37.141827097s
Average Latency 369.300622ms
Throughput 134.62 requests/second

NANOTDF Benchmark Results:

Metric Value
Total Requests 5000
Successful Requests 5000
Failed Requests 0
Concurrent Requests 50
Total Time 25.716412448s
Average Latency 256.20079ms
Throughput 194.43 requests/second

@dmihalcik-virtru dmihalcik-virtru added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 26, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit aaf43dc Jun 26, 2025
29 checks passed
@dmihalcik-virtru dmihalcik-virtru deleted the DSPX-1296-proto-fix branch June 26, 2025 11:21
@dmihalcik-virtru
Copy link
Member Author

/backport

@dmihalcik-virtru
Copy link
Member Author

/backport now with label

@opentdf-automation
Copy link
Contributor

Backport failed for release/protocol/go/v0.5: couldn't find remote ref release/protocol/go/v0.5.
Please ensure that this Github repo has a branch named release/protocol/go/v0.5.

opentdf-automation bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2025
### Proposed Changes

*

### Checklist

- [ ] I have added or updated unit tests
- [ ] I have added or updated integration tests (if appropriate)
- [ ] I have added or updated documentation

### Testing Instructions

(cherry picked from commit aaf43dc)
@opentdf-automation
Copy link
Contributor

Successfully created backport PR for release/protocol/go/v0.5:

opentdf-automation bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2025
### Proposed Changes

*

### Checklist

- [ ] I have added or updated unit tests
- [ ] I have added or updated integration tests (if appropriate)
- [ ] I have added or updated documentation

### Testing Instructions

(cherry picked from commit aaf43dc)
dmihalcik-virtru pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2025
…o/v0.5] (#2489)

# Description
Backport of #2485 to `release/protocol/go/v0.5`.

Co-authored-by: opentdf-automation[bot] <149537512+opentdf-automation[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.6.0](protocol/go/v0.5.0...protocol/go/v0.6.0)
(2025-07-09)


### Features

* **authz:** sensible request limit upper bounds
([#2526](#2526))
([b3093cc](b3093cc))
* **policy:** Add list key mappings rpc.
([#2533](#2533))
([fbc2724](fbc2724))


### Bug Fixes

* **core:** Allow 521 curve to be used
([#2485](#2485))
([aaf43dc](aaf43dc))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: opentdf-automation[bot] <149537512+opentdf-automation[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.8.0](service/v0.7.0...service/v0.8.0)
(2025-07-29)


### Features

* **authz:** RR GetDecision improvements
([#2479](#2479))
([443cedb](443cedb))
* **authz:** sensible request limit upper bounds
([#2526](#2526))
([b3093cc](b3093cc))
* **core:** Add the ability to configure the http server settings
([#2522](#2522))
([b1472df](b1472df))
* **policy:** Add list key mappings rpc.
([#2533](#2533))
([fbc2724](fbc2724))
* **policy:** add obligation protos
([#2579](#2579))
([50882e1](50882e1))
* **policy:** add obligation tables
([#2532](#2532))
([c7d7aa4](c7d7aa4))
* **policy:** Add validation to delete keys
([#2576](#2576))
([cc169d9](cc169d9))
* **policy:** Allow the deletion of a key.
([#2575](#2575))
([82b96f0](82b96f0))
* **policy:** Change return type for delete key proto.
([#2566](#2566))
([c1ae924](c1ae924))
* **policy:** sqlc queries refactor
([#2541](#2541))
([e34680e](e34680e))


### Bug Fixes

* add back grants to listAttributesByDefOrValueFqns
([#2493](#2493))
([2b47095](2b47095))
* **authz:** access pdp should use proto getter
([#2530](#2530))
([f856212](f856212))
* **core:** Allow 521 curve to be used
([#2485](#2485))
([aaf43dc](aaf43dc))
* **core:** resolve 'built-in' typos
([#2548](#2548))
([ccdfa96](ccdfa96))
* **deps:** bump github.com/opentdf/platform/lib/ocrypto from 0.2.0 to
0.3.0 in /service
([#2504](#2504))
([a9cc4dd](a9cc4dd))
* **sdk:** Prefer KID and Algorithm selection from key maps
([#2475](#2475))
([98fd392](98fd392))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: opentdf-automation[bot] <149537512+opentdf-automation[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.7.0](protocol/go/v0.6.2...protocol/go/v0.7.0)
(2025-08-08)


### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

* **policy:** disable kas grants in favor of key mappings
([#2220](#2220))
* **core:** Require go 1.23+
([#1979](#1979))

### Features

* add ability to retrieve policy resources by id or name
([#1901](#1901))
([deb4455](deb4455))
* **authz:** authz v2, ers v2 protos and gencode for ABAC with actions &
registered resource
([#2124](#2124))
([ea7992a](ea7992a))
* **authz:** improve v2 request proto validation
([#2357](#2357))
([f927b99](f927b99))
* **authz:** sensible request limit upper bounds
([#2526](#2526))
([b3093cc](b3093cc))
* **core:** adds bulk rewrap to sdk and service
([#1835](#1835))
([11698ae](11698ae))
* **core:** EXPERIMENTAL: EC-wrapped key support
([#1902](#1902))
([652266f](652266f))
* **core:** Require go 1.23+
([#1979](#1979))
([164c922](164c922))
* **core:** v2 ERS with proto updates
([#2210](#2210))
([a161ef8](a161ef8))
* **policy:** add enhanced standard/custom actions protos
([#2020](#2020))
([bbac53f](bbac53f))
* **policy:** Add legacy keys.
([#2613](#2613))
([57370b0](57370b0))
* **policy:** Add list key mappings rpc.
([#2533](#2533))
([fbc2724](fbc2724))
* **policy:** add obligation protos
([#2579](#2579))
([50882e1](50882e1))
* **policy:** Add validation to delete keys
([#2576](#2576))
([cc169d9](cc169d9))
* **policy:** add values to CreateObligationRequest
([#2614](#2614))
([94535cc](94535cc))
* **policy:** adds new public keys table
([#1836](#1836))
([cad5048](cad5048))
* **policy:** Allow the deletion of a key.
([#2575](#2575))
([82b96f0](82b96f0))
* **policy:** cache SubjectConditionSet selectors in dedicated column
maintained via trigger
([#2320](#2320))
([215791f](215791f))
* **policy:** Change return type for delete key proto.
([#2566](#2566))
([c1ae924](c1ae924))
* **policy:** Default Platform Keys
([#2254](#2254))
([d7447fe](d7447fe))
* **policy:** disable kas grants in favor of key mappings
([#2220](#2220))
([30f8cf5](30f8cf5))
* **policy:** DSPX-1018 NDR retrieval by FQN support
([#2131](#2131))
([0001041](0001041))
* **policy:** DSPX-1057 registered resource action attribute values
(protos only) ([#2217](#2217))
([6375596](6375596))
* **policy:** DSPX-893 NDR define crud protos
([#2056](#2056))
([55a5c27](55a5c27))
* **policy:** DSPX-902 NDR service crud protos only (1/2)
([#2092](#2092))
([24b6cb5](24b6cb5))
* **policy:** Finish resource mapping groups
([#2224](#2224))
([5ff754e](5ff754e))
* **policy:** key management crud
([#2110](#2110))
([4c3d53d](4c3d53d))
* **policy:** Key management proto
([#2115](#2115))
([561f853](561f853))
* **policy:** Modify get request to search for keys by kasid with keyid.
([#2147](#2147))
([780d2e4](780d2e4))
* **policy:** Return KAS Key structure
([#2172](#2172))
([7f97b99](7f97b99))
* **policy:** Return Simple Kas Keys from non-Key RPCs
([#2387](#2387))
([5113e0e](5113e0e))
* **policy:** rotate keys rpc
([#2180](#2180))
([0d00743](0d00743))
* **policy:** Update key status's and UpdateKey rpc.
([#2315](#2315))
([7908db9](7908db9))
* **policy:** Update simple kas key
([#2378](#2378))
([09d8239](09d8239))


### Bug Fixes

* add pagination to list public key mappings response
([#1889](#1889))
([9898fbd](9898fbd))
* **core:** Allow 521 curve to be used
([#2485](#2485))
([aaf43dc](aaf43dc))
* **core:** Fixes protoJSON parse bug on ec rewrap
([#1943](#1943))
([9bebfd0](9bebfd0))
* **core:** Update fixtures and flattening in sdk and service
([#1827](#1827))
([d6d6a7a](d6d6a7a))
* **deps:** bump toolchain in /lib/fixtures and /examples to resolve CVE
GO-2025-3563 ([#2061](#2061))
([9c16843](9c16843))
* **policy:** protovalidate deprecated action types and removal of gRPC
gateway in subject mappings svc
([#2377](#2377))
([54a6de0](54a6de0))
* **policy:** remove gRPC gateway in policy except where needed
([#2382](#2382))
([1937acb](1937acb))
* **policy:** remove new public keys rpc's
([#1962](#1962))
([5049bab](5049bab))
* **policy:** remove predefined rules in actions protos
([#2069](#2069))
([060f059](060f059))
* **policy:** return kas uri on keys for definition, namespace and
values ([#2186](#2186))
([6c55fb8](6c55fb8))
* **sdk:** Fix compatibility between bulk and non-bulk rewrap
([#1914](#1914))
([74abbb6](74abbb6))
* update key_mode to provide more context
([#2226](#2226))
([44d0805](44d0805))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Co-authored-by: opentdf-automation[bot] <149537512+opentdf-automation[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Krish Suchak <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport release/protocol/go/v0.5 comp:policy Policy Configuration ( attributes, subject mappings, resource mappings, kas registry) size/xs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants