fix(main): Subject mapping tests #691
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @c-r33d, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves a flakiness problem observed in the end-to-end test for updating subject mappings. The changes enhance the test's reliability by incorporating explicit checks to confirm the successful setup of test data and by adding a debug output to assist in future diagnostics of any unexpected behavior. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
Summary of ChangesHello @c-r33d, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request aims to improve the reliability of the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to fix a flaky test in e2e/subject-mapping.bats by adding assertions to verify fixture creation. The changes are a good step towards making the test more robust. I've provided a couple of suggestions to further improve the test's reliability and readability. Specifically, I've pointed out a missing success assertion and suggested combining some assertions for conciseness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to fix a flaky test by adding more robust assertions and a debug log. The changes are a good step towards improving test stability. I've provided a couple of suggestions to further enhance the readability and robustness of the test assertions by ensuring command success is checked and by combining assertions for conciseness.
X-Test Results✅ java-v0.4.34 |
1.) The
updatesubject mapping test is currently flaky, add a debug log and asserts to ensure that the necessary fixtures are created first.Note
It's probable this happens again, but at least we will have some debug logs to figure out what is going on. The error was that the subject condition set was not always being created before trying to update to it.