Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QA tools/warnings #3130

Closed
4 of 6 tasks
aawiseman opened this issue May 23, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed
4 of 6 tasks

QA tools/warnings #3130

aawiseman opened this issue May 23, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
validation An issue with the validation or Q/A code

Comments

@aawiseman
Copy link

aawiseman commented May 23, 2016

There was some discussion on the HOT email list about some potential QA tools or QA-related warnings in iD that would be helpful:

@bhousel bhousel changed the title Basic QA tools/warnings QA tools/warnings May 23, 2016
@aawiseman
Copy link
Author

Oh another one, it might be good to highlight features that have fixme= in them!

@bhousel
Copy link
Member

bhousel commented May 23, 2016

I'm all for adding validation to iD where it makes sense, but I don't want to overwhelm new users with a bunch of messages about things that they won't understand, and might not even be responsible for.

Dedicated QA tools like Keepright and Osmose do great jobs at catching a lot of these conditions, and HOT has a pretty effective structure in place to have new mappers' edits reviewed by experienced validators.

The last thing I want to do is turn away enthusiastic new mappers by nagging them about their work.

But I think this list is a good start.. I'll think about these items and see if we can make some improvements, either in the iD training materials or the pre-save validations that iD runs.

@bhousel bhousel added the validation An issue with the validation or Q/A code label May 23, 2016
@bhousel bhousel added the considering Not Actionable - still considering if this is something we want label Nov 2, 2016
@aawiseman
Copy link
Author

I think in the pre-save validations would be great.

Or something related, maybe a little popup that comes up as you are mapping, for example if you do ten buildings in a row that aren't squared. That may be a heavier lift, however.

@quincylvania
Copy link
Collaborator

So a lot's changed in validation since this issue was posted!

I'm closing this since remaining actionable items are pretty well covered by other issues 👍

@quincylvania quincylvania removed the considering Not Actionable - still considering if this is something we want label Feb 27, 2020
@quincylvania quincylvania self-assigned this Feb 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
validation An issue with the validation or Q/A code
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants