Skip to content

Conversation

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed commented Mar 26, 2025

These have been enabled since before March 2024.

Upstream:

We can therefore safely remove these now that we are running 1.32 everywhere.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 26, 2025

Hello @JoelSpeed! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 26, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and everettraven March 26, 2025 14:10
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 26, 2025
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve cancel

Just for now until I've cleared this with CI and the architects

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 26, 2025
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

@benluddy
Copy link
Contributor

@benluddy Do you know what would happen if we remove this particular line?

We'll stop serving that GV... which we never wanted to serve to begin with outside of tech preview.

I remember there was some pain during the rebase because both the feature and its related APIs went directly from beta/off to GA/on. The intention must have been to follow up the rebase by removing the --runtime-config behavior from KASO. I don't know why openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator#1687 was closed.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

@benluddy I assume we don't want to forever gate this serving on the presence of the feature gate being passed, so, there are 2 paths forward I guess

  1. We stop serving the GV - err, breaking change?
  2. We keep serving the GV but don't gate on it anymore?

I assume 2 is the actual only real path, is that a lot of maintenance burden do you think? Or is there a viable "we think we can reason why 1 is ok" path?

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 11, 2025
@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed force-pushed the drop-default-kube-gates branch from 54ba57c to dec0a2e Compare May 2, 2025 13:27
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 2, 2025
@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed changed the title Remove upstream on-by-default feature gates (CloudDualStackNodeIPs, DisableKubeletCloudCredentialProviders, ValidatingAdmissionPolicy) Remove upstream on-by-default cloud feature gates (CloudDualStackNodeIPs, DisableKubeletCloudCredentialProviders) May 2, 2025
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

Having dropped ValidatingAdmissionPolicy from this PR, this is now ready to go

CC @elmiko as sig-cloud representative

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@elmiko elmiko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 2, 2025
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only

The CCMs dropped these last release, so these aren't leveraged anymore

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. label May 2, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7152b1b and 2 for PR HEAD dec0a2e in total

2 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7152b1b and 2 for PR HEAD dec0a2e in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7152b1b and 2 for PR HEAD dec0a2e in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ec925ab and 2 for PR HEAD dec0a2e in total

3 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ec925ab and 2 for PR HEAD dec0a2e in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ec925ab and 2 for PR HEAD dec0a2e in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ec925ab and 2 for PR HEAD dec0a2e in total

…IPs, DisableKubeletCloudCredentialProviders)
@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed force-pushed the drop-default-kube-gates branch from dec0a2e to 46fd228 Compare May 7, 2025 10:35
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 7, 2025
@elmiko
Copy link
Contributor

elmiko commented May 7, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 7, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 7, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: elmiko, JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD f158127 and 2 for PR HEAD 46fd228 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7318813 and 2 for PR HEAD 46fd228 in total

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7318813 and 2 for PR HEAD 46fd228 in total

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial

Suite succeeded, but timed out on deprovision

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 8, 2025

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial

Suite succeeded, but timed out on deprovision

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7318813 and 2 for PR HEAD 46fd228 in total

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7318813 and 2 for PR HEAD 46fd228 in total

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 9, 2025

@JoelSpeed: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-images 54ba57c link true /test okd-scos-images
ci/prow/e2e-azure 46fd228 link false /test e2e-azure
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 46fd228 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD f14ed7c and 2 for PR HEAD 46fd228 in total

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit b7d0ca2 into openshift:master May 9, 2025
22 of 24 checks passed
@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-cluster-config-api
This PR has been included in build ose-cluster-config-api-container-v4.20.0-202505092247.p0.gb7d0ca2.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants