You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: proposals/stage-1/CODE_OF_CONDUCT/README.md
+22-3Lines changed: 22 additions & 3 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -7,8 +7,11 @@ Michael Dawson (@mhdawson)
7
7
8
8
## Description
9
9
10
-
This document captures a proposed approach for
10
+
These documents capture a proposed approach for implementing and handling Code of Conducts within the Foundation.
11
+
12
+
* FOUNDATION_CODE_OF_CONDUCT_REQUIREMENTS.md: a proposed approach for
11
13
managing Code of Conducts within the Foundation.
14
+
* HANDLING-REPORTS.md: a proposed framework for handling reports and escalation.
12
15
13
16
## Required Resources
14
17
@@ -18,11 +21,11 @@ Discussion/approval by bootstrap committee
18
21
19
22
In current proposals for the groups within a merged
20
23
foundation, the responsibility would be a joint
21
-
responsibility of the Foundation, Board, CPC and projects.
24
+
responsibility of the Foundation, Board, CPC, and projects.
22
25
23
26
## How would success be measured?
24
27
25
-
Success is incorporate of the content within this document
28
+
Success is incorporation of the content within this document
26
29
either as the document itself or incorporate into one
27
30
of the other Governance documents for the foundation.
28
31
@@ -34,4 +37,20 @@ foundation.
34
37
35
38
## What is neccessary to complete this proposal
36
39
40
+
* Aligned language within the documents of the proposal
41
+
42
+
## Further questions
43
+
44
+
* How do we protect privacy?
45
+
* How do we investigate?
46
+
* What are the conflicts of interest?
47
+
* How to avoid conflicts of interest?
48
+
* Does this relate to the work of the Node.js and other projects’ moderation team?
49
+
50
+
### Implementation details for channels
51
+
* Form: It would be easier on the reportee to have a form template to help them structure their report. The form submission could trigger an email. TODO: copy for a form.
52
+
* Repo: openjs/moderation (not provisioned). As commented in PR review, hosting sensitive personal information on GitHub needs due consideration, review, and possibly legal consultation.
37
53
54
+
### What to look forward to
55
+
* Beacon project
56
+
* Code of Conduct Project: A cross-project collaboration between multiple open source tech communities RxJS, AngularJS, Node.js, Vue.js etc to find consensus on Code of Conducts. Progress is rapid and can add definition to our own process (where possible) within 6 months. Recommend incorporating the findings and avoid duplication of effort.
0 commit comments