Skip to content

Commit 57a196a

Browse files
committed
adds text describing the upper-case keywords used in the spec
Signed-off-by: Mike Brown <[email protected]>
1 parent 8d66fdd commit 57a196a

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-0
lines changed

README.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ Table of Contents
1616
- [Linux Specific Runtime](runtime-linux.md)
1717
- [Implementations](implementations.md)
1818

19+
In the specifications in the above table of contents, the keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119](http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119) (Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997).
20+
1921
# Use Cases
2022

2123
To provide context for users the following section gives example use cases for each part of the spec.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)