-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hoe hou je je abonnement in stand bij een nieuwe versie van een zaaktype? #144
Comments
Refinement: This sounds like a problem indeed. We either need to 1) rework the whole "use uuid" idea (not likely to happen, seeing its even part of the NL API strategy) or 2) the Catalog API should not change the uuid when the version changes (much desired from me personally) Zaaktypes:
Objecttypes:
So, we should maybe adopt the Objecttypes versioning scheme so you can subscribe to the "latest" version URL. |
Related Gemma zaken issues: VNG-Realisatie/gemma-zaken#1851 Afaik this was (and not anymore) considered tackled in Catalogi API v1.3 (Historie model) https://vng-realisatie.github.io/gemma-zaken/standaard/catalogi/release_notes.html |
If you can find there if UUIDs are no longer unique, show me a screenshot :) |
@joeribekker see the details from the Historiemodel Catalogi API, where non-unique UUIDs were implied: https://michielverhoef.github.io/gemma-zaken/standaard/catalogi/#ztc-013 But this was reverted as far as I know. It may cause our developer-heads to explode and have too many consequences throughout the codebase but from a API backwards-compatibility sense it made sense in my eyes |
Refinement: We could:
The only way to change this without changing the standard is with option 2 but we highly recommend changing the API standard with this scenario in mind. |
DH Taiga 420
Hoe hou je je abonnement in stand bij een nieuwe versie van een zaaktype? Meer een open vraag, hier heb ik eigenlijk geen antwoord op (behalve opnieuw aanmaken).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: