Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor current span handling for newly created spans. #198
Refactor current span handling for newly created spans. #198
Changes from 2 commits
bf80341
6f7fdd3
a9dd24e
635f1b9
feb9334
aaad6c3
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
According to https://github.com/python/mypy/blob/master/docs/source/protocols.rst#context-manager-protocols, and IIRC most context managers like this return null.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I was wondering about this one later on (specially about the
null
case - I'm wondering why there's nothing for this already available in thetyping
module ;) )There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is kind of confusing since
Span
is the context manager now, notstart_span
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, right, this needs to be cleared up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you want to make this consistent with the other example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense, will update.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why keep this one a context manager instead of returning the span like the other?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I didn't try that out. I will give it a spin and see how it looks ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I think we should implement
start_as_current_span
in the API. Other API-implementations that need special behavior here can still override. EDIT: But this is not why I "requested changes".There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Iterator is the wrong type here. Correct would be
ContextManger[Span]
but that does not exist in Python 3.5. So I guess this is a case where we have to use something like-> SpanContextManager
and abovehttps://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/common_issues.html#import-cycles
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Honestly I'd leave this out for now, as it makes the code ugly ;)
(Else, I'd add it in another PR)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't want to hold this PR up and I don't know why mypy accepts it and I agree that this (my suggested) code is very ugly. But: If I'm reading this correctly, the annotation is in fact wrong. If it were correct, you'd use this function as
for span in tracer().start_as_current_span()
. An iterator has noset_attribute
, but it has__next__
. A context manager has neither.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I honestly feel like this is not the place to discuss this - this change it's even now, as we speak, in
master
- check out https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python/blob/master/opentelemetry-api/src/opentelemetry/trace/__init__.py#L385-> It's still defined as
start_span
instead ofstart_as_current_span
and in both cases, aSpan
is yielded.I have no problem adjusting things that were changed in this PR, but I honestly see no reason to change things that were there before, unless they are fatal. Otherwise, we will in my next review something else that could be improved, and then we will have to discuss them and have yet another iteration ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The point is that your removed the
@contextmanager
and consequently changedyield
toreturn
so it keeps working fine at runtime, but I think it messes up the type annotation. Unless the interaction between@contextmanager
and the function return type is not taken into account by mypy, then it would already have been wrong before.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
--> #219
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've always been struggling with naming.
Given this technically is
start_span
thenuse_span
, maybe we should just call itstart_and_use_span
❓There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can add one more suggestion:
use_new_span
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd actually argue that "start_span" should remain as is, and we should maybe provide separate terminology for the two components of span creation and use.
I don't imagine most consumers will really need to separate span creation and use, and may find it as needlessly verbose for "start_and_use_span".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is also about consistency across languages.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually the function can be implemented more simply and efficiently without
@contextmanager
andIterator
by replaing thewith
statement:return self.use_span(span, True)
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hah! Right. I remember this is how I envisioned it first, but I guess I was decaffeinated when I wrote it ;(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd re-add
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unless I'm missing some use case, now that
Span
callsend
on exit it looks like you could loseend_on_exit
and just letuse_span
be responsible for setting the context:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one didn't work - calling
yield()
on theSpan
didn't to the trick/chaining, so I had to keep the original one ;)