-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
Release candidate #15
Comments
/cc @open-telemetry/javascript-maintainers |
I think we can tag it both on github and npm ? |
To me it seems like there are a few places we could tag the current version as RC:
In addition to that, we could release a version like The question is: is it sufficient to tag 0.18 as our release candidate? Or do we need to release a semver prerelease version also? |
looking at other SIGS:
Do we actually expect to run RC release ? If not i'm not sure making a full release would be that useful. Generally i would go with git tag + npm releases to tag it somewhere. |
If we define such release as RC, I'd vote for semver like |
This is why I wanted it to be the same as 0.18. If someone installs |
I see, i think adding a note in the readme + a tag on github (that point to the same commit as 0.18.0) for historic purpose would be fine ? |
As far as I remember your version check in API doesn't include the pre-release part. Therefore I think breaking changes are no longer allowed in this phase. |
That is correct. I didn't mean "safely" as in "it wont break users" but the only users who have the rc are ones who are explicitly opted in. I think we should try as hard as possible to avoid breaking. |
I believe we can close this since we went GA |
Is it sufficient to put on the README for the API that 0.18 is the release candidate? Or do we want to release something like 1.0.0-rc.1?
Originally posted by @dyladan in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js#1982 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: