You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Apply the same optimization as done in SumoLogic/sumologic-otel-collector#593 to all the informers in order to reduce the memory footprint per suggestion from @swiatekm-sumo.
Hopefully, it'll make the heap usage less than before introducing cluster-wise replicaset informers, as reported in #23067.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Are we sure we want to do namespaces? Relatively speaking, there tends to be a small number of them in the cluster, and they don't carry a lot of data. Maybe the memory savings aren't worth the additional complexity in their case?
Are we sure we want to do namespaces? Relatively speaking, there tends to be a small number of them in the cluster, and they don't carry a lot of data. Maybe the memory savings aren't worth the additional complexity in their case?
I agree. Let's keep the namespaces informer as is.
Apply the same optimization as done in SumoLogic/sumologic-otel-collector#593 to all the informers in order to reduce the memory footprint per suggestion from @swiatekm-sumo.
Hopefully, it'll make the heap usage less than before introducing cluster-wise replicaset informers, as reported in #23067.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: