Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extension request: Include details of review committee #263

Closed
timgdavies opened this issue Nov 18, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Extension request: Include details of review committee #263

timgdavies opened this issue Nov 18, 2015 · 1 comment
Labels
Focus - Extensions Relating to new or proposed extensions, or the governance and maintenance of extensions
Milestone

Comments

@timgdavies
Copy link
Contributor

timgdavies commented Nov 18, 2015

Data from Taiwan includes details of the committee who reviewed bids. This often involves invited experts.

The current model used:

committee: {
     id: "ocid-6as3t2-51191302-committee",
    member: [
    {
          profession: "進修學校主任",
          name: "葉宗哲",
          attend: true
    },
    {
          profession: "學務主任",
          name: "林秋東",
          attend: true
   }
   ]
}

Questions:

  • Do other countries have example of publishing the evaluation committee?
@timgdavies timgdavies added the Focus - Extensions Relating to new or proposed extensions, or the governance and maintenance of extensions label Nov 18, 2015
@timgdavies timgdavies added this to the Version 1.1 milestone May 23, 2016
@timgdavies
Copy link
Contributor Author

The model proposed in #368 offers the ability to capture committee members involved in a contracting process overall. It does not currently allow linkage between committee members and specific awards, so if that is required, some additional modelling may be needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Focus - Extensions Relating to new or proposed extensions, or the governance and maintenance of extensions
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant